Suppr超能文献

内镜下腕管松解术:技术、争议及与开放式技术的比较。

Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: Techniques, Controversies, and Comparison to Open Techniques.

机构信息

From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Orthopedic Hospital (Hacquebord, Chen, and Rettig), NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.

出版信息

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Apr 1;30(7):292-301. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00949.

Abstract

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) continues to rise in popularity as a treatment option for carpal tunnel syndrome. Numerous variations in technique and instrumentation currently exist, broadly classified into two-portal and single-portal techniques with antegrade and retrograde designs. ECTR is equally effective as open carpal tunnel release for alleviating symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome with no differences in long-term outcomes. ECTR has an increased risk of transient nerve injury, whereas open carpal tunnel release has an increased risk of wound and scar complications. ECTR has higher direct costs but is associated with earlier return to work. ECTR is a safe and effective approach to carpal tunnel release in the hands of experienced surgeons.

摘要

内窥镜腕管松解术(ECTR)作为治疗腕管综合征的一种治疗选择,其应用日益普及。目前,该技术和器械存在多种不同的方法,大致可分为双隧道和单隧道技术,以及顺行和逆行设计。ECTR 与开放式腕管松解术一样有效,可以缓解腕管综合征的症状,且长期结果无差异。ECTR 发生短暂性神经损伤的风险增加,而开放式腕管松解术发生伤口和瘢痕并发症的风险增加。ECTR 的直接成本较高,但与更早的工作恢复相关。在经验丰富的外科医生手中,ECTR 是一种安全有效的腕管松解方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验