MedVet Medical and Cancer Center for Pets, Worthington, Ohio, USA.
Nexus Veterinary Bone & Joint Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Vet Surg. 2022 Apr;51(3):489-496. doi: 10.1111/vsu.13790. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
To describe the technique of combined center of rotation of angulation (CORA)-based leveling osteotomy (CBLO) with tibial tuberosity transposition (TTT) and to compare the load to failure between CBLO combined with TTT and CBLO or TTT alone.
Ex vivo study.
Twelve pairs of cadaveric pelvic limbs.
Six pairs of cadaveric tibia were tested in each group (CBLO-TTT versus CBLO) and (CBLO-TTT versus TTT) with each limb randomly assigned to a treatment group. Construct stability was determined by applying a tensile force to each patellar tendon until failure occurred. Load at failure and mode of failure were recorded for each specimen.
No difference in mean load to failure was identified between CBLO-TTT (897 N) and CBLO alone (943 N) (P = .81). There was also no difference in the mean load to failure between the CBLO-TTT (928 N) and TTT alone (1046 N) (P = .12).
Performing a TTT in combination with a CBLO does not weaken the construct failure to load when compared with each procedure performed alone.
A combined CBLO and TTT could be considered a viable option for concurrent management of a cranial cruciate ligament deficient stifle and medial patella luxation.
描述基于旋转中心角度(CORA)的平衡截骨术(CBLO)与胫骨结节转移术(TTT)联合应用的技术,并比较 CBLO 联合 TTT 与 CBLO 或 TTT 单独应用的失效负荷。
尸体外研究。
12 对尸体骨盆肢体。
每组 6 对尸体胫骨进行测试(CBLO-TTT 与 CBLO 相比和 CBLO-TTT 与 TTT 相比),每条肢体随机分配到一个治疗组。通过对每个髌腱施加拉伸力来确定结构稳定性,直到发生失效。记录每个标本的失效负荷和失效模式。
CBLO-TTT(897 N)与单独 CBLO(943 N)之间的平均失效负荷无差异(P =.81)。CBLO-TTT(928 N)与单独 TTT(1046 N)之间的平均失效负荷也无差异(P =.12)。
与单独进行每种手术相比,同时进行 TTT 与 CBLO 不会削弱结构失效的负荷。
联合 CBLO 和 TTT 可被视为同时管理十字韧带断裂的膝关节和内侧髌骨脱位的可行选择。