Department of Paediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2022 Jun 1;74(6):823-829. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003441. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
Infant formulas (IF) with postbiotics, defined as inanimate microorganisms and/or their components that confer a health benefit on the host, are available. We systematically updated evidence on the safety and health effects of administering iF with postbiotics (with or without other modifications) compared with standard IF.
The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases were searched to December 2021.
Eleven randomized controlled trials were included. Using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2, for the primary outcomes, 5 trials had an overall high risk of bias, and 6 trials had some concerns of bias. Most data were available on IF fermented with Bifidobacterium breve C50 and Streptococcus thermophilus (BB/ST). These formulas, compared with the standard IF, were safe and well tolerated. Postbiotic formulas with additional modifications (ie, formula fermented with BB/ST & prebiotics, partly fermented formula with BB/ST and prebiotics with or without modified milk fat, partly fermented antiregurgitation formula with BB/ST and prebiotics) were generally safe and well tolerated but did not offer clear benefits replicated in other studies. Only limited data were available on formula fermented with Lactobacillus paracasei CBA L74.
IF with postbiotics evaluated so far are safe and well tolerated by infants who cannot be breastfed. No firm conclusion can, however, be reached regarding the clinical effects and benefit of one formula over another. It seems reasonable to discuss with healthcare providers current evidence regarding specific modifications in infant formulas and let them decide whether the expected benefits meet expectations and are worth the cost.
后生元定义为无生命的微生物及其成分,对宿主健康有益,具有后生元的婴儿配方奶粉(IF)已经上市。我们系统地更新了后生元(有或没有其他修饰)添加到 IF 中与标准 IF 相比的安全性和健康效果的证据。
Cochrane 图书馆、MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 数据库检索至 2021 年 12 月。
纳入了 11 项随机对照试验。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具 2,对于主要结局,5 项试验总体上存在高偏倚风险,6 项试验存在一些偏倚问题。大多数数据可用于发酵 Bifidobacterium breve C50 和 Streptococcus thermophilus(BB/ST)的 IF。与标准 IF 相比,这些配方安全且耐受良好。添加了其他修饰物(即发酵 BB/ST 和益生元的配方、部分发酵配方中含有 BB/ST 和益生元、含或不含改良乳脂的部分发酵抗反流配方、含有 BB/ST 和益生元的部分发酵抗反流配方)的后生元配方通常安全且耐受良好,但在其他研究中未提供可复制的明确获益。只有有限的数据可用于发酵 Lactobacillus paracasei CBA L74 的配方。
迄今为止评估的后生元 IF 对不能母乳喂养的婴儿是安全且耐受良好的。然而,对于一种配方优于另一种配方的临床效果和益处,无法得出明确的结论。与医疗保健提供者讨论婴儿配方奶粉中特定修饰物的现有证据,并让他们决定预期的益处是否符合期望且物有所值,似乎是合理的。