Yan Tingting, Wang Peng, Xu Zou-Hong, Sun Wei-Yin
Coordination Chemistry Institute, State Key Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing National Laboratory of Microstructures, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022 Mar 23;14(11):13645-13652. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c00487. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) can be utilized as electrocatalysts for CO reduction reaction (CORR) due to their well dispersed metal centers. However, the influence of metal node distribution on electrochemical CORR was rarely explored. Here, three Cu-MOFs with different copper(II) site distribution were employed for CO electroreduction. The Cu-MOFs [Cu(L)SO]·HO (), Cu(L)(HO)·HO (), and Cu(L)(HO) () were achieved by using the same ligand 1,3,5-tris(1-imidazolyl)benzene (L) but different Cu(II) salts. The results show that the Faraday efficiency of CO (FE) for is 4 times that of the FE, while the FE of is twice that of the FE. As for , there is not much difference between FE and FE. Such difference may arise from the distinct electrochemical active surface area and charge transfer kinetics caused by different copper site distribution. Furthermore, the different framework structures also affect the activity of the copper sites, which was supported by the theoretically calculated Gibbs free energy and electron density, contributing to the selectivity of CORR. This study provides a strategy for modulating the selectivity of CORR by tuning the distribution of the active centers in MOFs.
金属有机框架材料(MOFs)因其金属中心分散良好,可作为电催化剂用于CO还原反应(CORR)。然而,金属节点分布对电化学CORR的影响鲜有研究。在此,采用三种具有不同铜(II)位点分布的Cu-MOFs用于CO电还原。通过使用相同的配体1,3,5-三(1-咪唑基)苯(L)但不同的Cu(II)盐,制备得到了Cu-MOFs [Cu(L)SO]·HO ()、Cu(L)(HO)·HO ()和Cu(L)(HO) ()。结果表明,对于 ,CO的法拉第效率(FE)是 的4倍,而 的FE是 的2倍。至于 ,FE和FE之间没有太大差异。这种差异可能源于不同铜位点分布导致的不同电化学活性表面积和电荷转移动力学。此外,不同的框架结构也影响铜位点的活性,这得到了理论计算的吉布斯自由能和电子密度的支持,有助于CORR的选择性。本研究提供了一种通过调节MOFs中活性中心的分布来调控CORR选择性的策略。