Kelly Brian P, Silva Casey R, Lehrman Jennifer N, Sawa Anna G U, de Andrada Pereira Bernardo, Godzik Jakub, Turner Jay D
Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
J Biomech. 2022 Apr;135:111025. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111025. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
Few studies have used optical full-field surface strain mapping to study spinal biomechanics. We used a commercial digital imaging correlation (DIC) system to (1) compare posterior surface strains on spinal rods with those obtained from conventional foil strain gauges, (2) quantify bony vertebral body and intervertebral disc (IVD) surface strains on 3 L3-S cadaveric spines during gold-standard flexibility tests (7.5-Nm flexion-extension and 400-N compression), and (3) report our experience with the application and feasibility of DIC to comprehensively map strain in spinal biomechanics. Spinal rods were tested under zero load and using ASTM F1717 standard. For rod strain measures, the largest mean bias offset and baseline noise standard deviation under zero load for DIC were 7.6 με and 33.7 με, respectively. For tissue measures, the largest mean bias offset was 8 με for ε1 and -55 με for ε2 with baseline noise standard deviations of 19 με and 26 με, respectively. On average, DIC rod strain measurements were 5.3% less than strain gauge measurements throughout the load range. Principal IVD and bony surface strains were consistently measurable and showed marked regional differences in strain patterns under different load conditions. Strains measured on spinal rods using DIC techniques reasonably agreed with standard strain gauge measurements. Subregional strain analyses on soft and hard spinal tissues during standard flexibility tests were feasible. Optical strain mapping is a viable, accurate, and promising measurement technique for novel spinal biomechanical studies.
很少有研究使用光学全场表面应变映射来研究脊柱生物力学。我们使用了一种商用数字图像相关(DIC)系统来:(1)比较脊柱棒后表面应变与传统箔式应变片获得的应变;(2)在金标准柔韧性测试(7.5 N·m屈伸和400 N压缩)期间,量化3具L3 - S尸体脊柱上椎体和椎间盘(IVD)表面应变;(3)报告我们在DIC应用于全面映射脊柱生物力学应变方面的经验和可行性。脊柱棒在零载荷下并按照ASTM F1717标准进行测试。对于棒应变测量,DIC在零载荷下的最大平均偏差偏移和基线噪声标准偏差分别为7.6 με和33.7 με。对于组织测量,ε1的最大平均偏差偏移为8 με,ε2为 -55 με,基线噪声标准偏差分别为19 με和26 με。在整个载荷范围内,DIC棒应变测量平均比应变片测量少5.3%。在不同载荷条件下,主要的IVD和骨表面应变始终可测量,并且在应变模式上显示出明显的区域差异。使用DIC技术在脊柱棒上测量的应变与标准应变片测量结果合理一致。在标准柔韧性测试期间对脊柱软硬组织进行亚区域应变分析是可行的。光学应变映射是一种用于新型脊柱生物力学研究的可行、准确且有前景的测量技术。