Montandon A, Brügger D, Hodler J
Klin Wochenschr. 1986 Jun 16;64(12):552-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01735318.
The survival of transplanted cadaver kidneys was compared in a group of 33 first-transplant patients treated with antazoline (Antistine) in addition to conventional immunosuppressive therapy (group A) and a group of 36 patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy only (group B). After 1 year, the transplant survival rate was 79% in group A as compared to 56% in group B (P less than 0.05). The difference which was still present after 2 and 5 years could not be attributed to any other factors that might have influenced the survival rate. Antazoline appears above all to diminish the intensity of moderately severe rejection episodes, which often lead to graft loss inducing a chronic type of rejection reaction. However, the frequency of rejection crises during the first 4 months and the percentages of patients without rejection or with primary irreversible rejection crises were practically the same in the two groups. The mechanism of action underlying this potentially important immunosuppressive effect of antazoline is as yet not clarified.
在一组33例首次接受移植的患者(A组)中,除了常规免疫抑制治疗外,还使用了安他唑啉(安他斯汀)进行治疗;另一组36例患者(B组)仅接受免疫抑制治疗。比较了两组尸体移植肾的存活率。1年后,A组移植肾存活率为79%,而B组为56%(P<0.05)。2年和5年后仍存在的差异不能归因于任何可能影响存活率的其他因素。安他唑啉似乎首先能减轻中度严重排斥反应的强度,这种排斥反应常常导致移植物丢失并引发慢性排斥反应。然而,两组在前4个月的排斥危机发生率以及无排斥反应或发生原发性不可逆排斥危机的患者百分比实际上是相同的。安他唑啉这种潜在重要免疫抑制作用的作用机制尚未阐明。