Parker David
Department of Physiology, Development, and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Neural Regen Res. 2022 Oct;17(10):2272-2277. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.335828.
While the anatomical properties of regenerated axons across spinal cord lesion sites have been studied extensively, little is known of how the functional properties of regenerated synapses compared to those in unlesioned animals. This study aims to compare the properties of synapses made by regenerated axons with unlesioned axons using the lamprey, a model system for spinal injury research, in which functional locomotor recovery after spinal cord lesions is associated with axonal regeneration across the lesion site. Regenerated synapses below the lesion site did not differ from synapses from unlesioned axons with respect to the amplitude and duration of single excitatory postsynaptic potentials. They also showed the same activity-dependent depression over spike trains. However, regenerated synapses did differ from unlesioned synapses as the estimated number of synaptic vesicles was greater and there was evidence for increased postsynaptic quantal amplitude. For axons above the lesion site, the amplitude and duration of single synaptic inputs also did not differ significantly from unlesioned animals. However, in this case, there was evidence of a reduction in release probability and inputs facilitated rather than depressed over spike trains. Synaptic inputs from single regenerated axons below the lesion site thus do not increase in amplitude to compensate for the reduced number of descending axons after functional recovery. However, the postsynaptic input was maintained at the unlesioned level using different synaptic properties. Conversely, the facilitation from the same initial amplitude above the lesion site made the synaptic input over spike trains functionally stronger. This may help to increase propriospinal activity across the lesion site to compensate for the lesion-induced reduction in supraspinal inputs. The animal experiments were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Cambridge University.
虽然已对脊髓损伤部位再生轴突的解剖学特性进行了广泛研究,但对于再生突触的功能特性与未损伤动物的突触相比情况如何却知之甚少。本研究旨在利用七鳃鳗(一种脊髓损伤研究的模型系统,脊髓损伤后功能运动恢复与损伤部位的轴突再生相关),比较再生轴突形成的突触与未损伤轴突形成的突触的特性。损伤部位下方的再生突触在单个兴奋性突触后电位的幅度和持续时间方面与未损伤轴突形成的突触没有差异。它们在一连串动作电位上也表现出相同的活动依赖性抑制。然而,再生突触与未损伤突触确实存在差异,因为估计的突触小泡数量更多,并且有证据表明突触后量子幅度增加。对于损伤部位上方的轴突,单个突触输入的幅度和持续时间与未损伤动物相比也没有显著差异。然而,在这种情况下,有证据表明释放概率降低,并且输入在一连串动作电位上表现为易化而非抑制。因此,损伤部位下方单个再生轴突的突触输入幅度不会增加以补偿功能恢复后下行轴突数量的减少。然而,利用不同的突触特性,突触后输入维持在未损伤水平。相反,损伤部位上方相同初始幅度的易化使得一连串动作电位上的突触输入在功能上更强。这可能有助于增加损伤部位的脊髓固有活动,以补偿损伤引起的脊髓上输入减少。动物实验获得了剑桥大学动物伦理委员会的批准。