Suppr超能文献

慢性呼吸困难的评估和诊断:文献综述。

Assessment and diagnosis of chronic dyspnoea: a literature review.

机构信息

Respiratory Group, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2022 Mar 8;32(1):10. doi: 10.1038/s41533-022-00271-1.

Abstract

Dyspnoea or breathlessness is a common presenting symptom among patients attending primary care services. This review aimed to determine whether there are clinical tools that can be incorporated into a clinical decision support system for primary care for efficient and accurate diagnosis of causes of chronic dyspnoea. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Google Scholar for all literature published between 1946 and 2020. Studies that evaluated a clinical algorithm for assessment of chronic dyspnoea in patients of any age group presenting to physicians with chronic dyspnoea were included. We identified 326 abstracts, 55 papers were reviewed, and eight included. A total 2026 patients aged between 20-80 years were included, 60% were women. The duration of dyspnoea was three weeks to 25 years. All studies undertook a stepwise or algorithmic approach to the assessment of dyspnoea. The results indicate that following history taking and physical examination, the first stage should include simply performed tests such as pulse oximetry, spirometry, and electrocardiography. If the patient remains undiagnosed, the second stage includes investigations such as chest x-ray, thyroid function tests, full blood count and NT-proBNP. In the third stage patients are referred for more advanced tests such as echocardiogram and thoracic CT. If dyspnoea remains unexplained, the fourth stage of assessment will require secondary care referral for more advanced diagnostic testing such as exercise tests. Utilising this proposed stepwise approach is expected to ascertain a cause for dyspnoea for 35% of the patients in stage 1, 83% by stage 3 and >90% of patients by stage 4.

摘要

呼吸困难或气促是在初级保健服务就诊的患者常见的主要症状。本综述旨在确定是否有临床工具可以纳入初级保健临床决策支持系统,以有效和准确地诊断慢性气促的病因。我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Google Scholar 中 1946 年至 2020 年期间发表的所有文献。纳入评估任何年龄段因慢性气促就诊的患者的慢性气促临床评估算法的研究。我们共识别了 326 篇摘要,55 篇文章进行了综述,其中 8 篇被纳入。共纳入了 2026 名年龄在 20-80 岁之间的患者,其中 60%为女性。气促持续时间为 3 周至 25 年。所有研究均采用逐步或算法方法评估气促。结果表明,在进行病史采集和体格检查后,第一阶段应包括简单的检查,如脉搏血氧饱和度、肺量测定和心电图。如果患者仍未确诊,第二阶段包括胸部 X 光、甲状腺功能检查、全血细胞计数和 NT-proBNP 等检查。如果患者仍未确诊,第三阶段包括超声心动图和胸部 CT 等更高级的检查。如果气促仍无法解释,第四阶段的评估将需要二级保健转介以进行更高级的诊断测试,如运动试验。预计使用这种分步评估方法,第一阶段可确定 35%患者的气促病因,第三阶段可确定 83%的患者,第四阶段可确定 >90%的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdbd/8904603/033970e9a274/41533_2022_271_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验