Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Aug;37(10):2438-2445. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07275-6. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
Despite evidence of their effectiveness, free smoking quitlines are underused. The best way to educate providers about and encourage use of quitlines is not established. We examined if electronic medical record (EMR)-integrated best practices alerts (BPAs) with or without additional provider education resulted in increased quitline referrals.
Waitlist-controlled, cluster-randomized trial of primary care practices assigned to three arms. Providers in participating sites received a new EMR-based BPA for quitline referral and additional education outreach visits, the BPA alone, or usual care. The study was conducted in 2 phases: phase 1 from April 17 to October 16, 2017, and phase 2 from November 9, 2017, to May 8, 2018. In phase 2, the usual-care sites were randomized to either of the two intervention arms. The unit of randomization was primary care practice site. All in-office, primary care provider visits with smokers were included. The primary outcome was referral to the quitline. Secondary outcomes included patient acceptance and enrollment in quitline services.
Twenty-two practice sites were enrolled. Smoking prevalence at sites ranged from 4.4 to 23%. In phase 1, the BPA-plus-education arm had 5636 eligible encounters and 405 referrals (referral rate 7.2%) while the BPA-only arm had 6857 eligible encounters and 623 referrals (referral rate 9.1%). The usual-care arm had 7434 encounters but no referrals. Comparing the BPA-plus arm to the BPA-only arm, the odds ratio of referral was 0.76 (CI 0.3-1.8). In phase 2, the combined BPA-plus-education sites had 8516 eligible encounters and 475 referrals (rate 5.6%). The BPA-only sites had 9134 eligible encounters and 470 referrals (rate 5.2%). The odds ratio comparing the 2 groups in phase 2 was 1.06 (0.5-2.2).
An EMR-based BPA can improve the number of referrals to quitline services, though more work is needed to improve providers' use of quitlines and low patient acceptance of services. Trial Registration NIH Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03229356.
尽管有证据表明其有效性,但免费戒烟热线的使用率仍然很低。尚未确定教育提供者并鼓励其使用戒烟热线的最佳方法。我们研究了电子病历(EMR)集成的最佳实践提醒(BPA)是否结合或不结合额外的提供者教育会导致戒烟热线转介的增加。
采用随机分组、设对照组的临床试验,将初级保健机构分为三组。参与机构的提供者收到了新的 EMR 戒烟热线转介 BPA 和额外的教育外展访问,仅 BPA 或常规护理。研究分两个阶段进行:第一阶段从 2017 年 4 月 17 日至 10 月 16 日,第二阶段从 2017 年 11 月 9 日至 2018 年 5 月 8 日。在第二阶段,常规护理组随机分为两个干预组之一。随机分组单位为初级保健实践地点。所有在办公室、初级保健提供者与吸烟者的就诊均包括在内。主要结果是向戒烟热线转介。次要结果包括患者接受和参与戒烟热线服务。
共有 22 个实践地点参与。各地点的吸烟率从 4.4%到 23%不等。在第一阶段,BPA 加教育组有 5636 次合格的就诊和 405 次转介(转介率为 7.2%),而 BPA 组有 6857 次合格的就诊和 623 次转介(转介率为 9.1%)。常规护理组有 7434 次就诊,但没有转介。将 BPA 加组与 BPA 组进行比较,转介的优势比为 0.76(95%CI,0.3-1.8)。在第二阶段,联合 BPA 加教育组有 8516 次合格就诊和 475 次转介(转介率为 5.6%)。BPA 组有 9134 次合格就诊和 470 次转介(转介率为 5.2%)。第二阶段两组之间的优势比为 1.06(0.5-2.2)。
基于 EMR 的 BPA 可以提高戒烟热线服务的转介数量,但仍需要做更多工作来提高提供者对戒烟热线的使用以及患者对服务的低接受度。
试验注册 NIH ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03229356。