Sabet Ahad, Dickerson Daniel S, Kunina Eugenia E, Buccarello Anna Lucia, Monnet Joëlle
PRA Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
PRA Health Sciences, Lenexa, KS, USA.
Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Apr;9(2):693-704. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00432-1. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
The aim of the study was to demonstrate the bioequivalence, and compare the safety and tolerability of MSB11022, a proposed biosimilar of adalimumab, when delivered by either an autoinjector (AI) or a pre-filled syringe (PFS).
In this pharmacokinetic (PK), parallel group, open-label study, 216 healthy volunteers were randomised 1:1 to receive a single subcutaneous injection of a 40 mg/0.8 mL dose of MSB11022 administered via AI or PFS. Coprimary PK endpoints were maximum observed concentration (C), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC), and AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC). PK equivalence between the AI and PFS administration methods was declared if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of geometric least square means was entirely contained within the 80-125% equivalence margin for all coprimary endpoints. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated.
The 90% CI for the three coprimary PK endpoints (C, AUC and AUC) were entirely contained within the predefined equivalence margins of 80-125%. Mean serum concentration-time profiles were similar following injection via AI or PFS. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were comparable across both treatment groups. Study device-related TEAEs were reported by 11.3% and 13.1% of subjects in the AI and PFS treatment groups, respectively. Study drug-related TEAEs were reported by 28.3% and 34.6% of subjects in the AI and PFS treatment groups, respectively. Few subjects experienced injection-site reactions, mainly pain and erythema, regardless of the administration method.
Delivery of MSB11022 via an AI is bioequivalent to delivery via a PFS. The safety and tolerability profile of MSB11022 was comparable across administration methods. The development of an AI for MSB11022 provides a choice of self-injection devices available to patients, potentially improving treatment compliance.
ClinicalTrials.gov trial identifier: NCT04018599.
本研究的目的是证明阿达木单抗拟生物类似药MSB11022通过自动注射器(AI)或预填充注射器(PFS)给药时的生物等效性,并比较其安全性和耐受性。
在这项药代动力学(PK)平行组开放标签研究中,216名健康志愿者按1:1随机分组,接受单次皮下注射40mg/0.8mL剂量的MSB11022,分别通过AI或PFS给药。共同主要PK终点为最大观察浓度(Cmax)、从时间0至最后可定量浓度的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)以及从时间0外推至无穷大的AUC(AUC∞)。如果所有共同主要终点的几何最小二乘均值比的90%置信区间(CIs)完全包含在80-125%的等效范围内,则宣布AI和PFS给药方法之间的PK等效。同时评估安全性和耐受性。
三个共同主要PK终点(Cmax、AUC和AUC∞)的90%CI完全包含在预先定义的80-125%等效范围内。通过AI或PFS注射后的平均血清浓度-时间曲线相似。两个治疗组的治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAEs)具有可比性。AI和PFS治疗组分别有11.3%和13.1%的受试者报告了与研究器械相关的TEAEs。AI和PFS治疗组分别有28.3%和34.6%的受试者报告了与研究药物相关的TEAEs。无论给药方法如何,很少有受试者出现注射部位反应,主要是疼痛和红斑。
MSB11022通过AI给药与通过PFS给药具有生物等效性。MSB11022的安全性和耐受性在不同给药方法之间具有可比性。MSB11022自动注射器的开发为患者提供了自我注射装置的选择,可能会提高治疗依从性。
ClinicalTrials.gov试验标识符:NCT04018599。