Suppr超能文献

一项随机对照试验:比较在健康受试者中通过自动注射器和预填充注射器给药的阿达木单抗生物类似药MSB11022的药代动力学和耐受性。

A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of the Proposed Adalimumab Biosimilar MSB11022 Delivered via Autoinjector and Pre-filled Syringe in Healthy Subjects.

作者信息

Sabet Ahad, Dickerson Daniel S, Kunina Eugenia E, Buccarello Anna Lucia, Monnet Joëlle

机构信息

PRA Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

PRA Health Sciences, Lenexa, KS, USA.

出版信息

Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Apr;9(2):693-704. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00432-1. Epub 2022 Mar 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to demonstrate the bioequivalence, and compare the safety and tolerability of MSB11022, a proposed biosimilar of adalimumab, when delivered by either an autoinjector (AI) or a pre-filled syringe (PFS).

METHODS

In this pharmacokinetic (PK), parallel group, open-label study, 216 healthy volunteers were randomised 1:1 to receive a single subcutaneous injection of a 40 mg/0.8 mL dose of MSB11022 administered via AI or PFS. Coprimary PK endpoints were maximum observed concentration (C), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC), and AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC). PK equivalence between the AI and PFS administration methods was declared if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of geometric least square means was entirely contained within the 80-125% equivalence margin for all coprimary endpoints. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The 90% CI for the three coprimary PK endpoints (C, AUC and AUC) were entirely contained within the predefined equivalence margins of 80-125%. Mean serum concentration-time profiles were similar following injection via AI or PFS. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were comparable across both treatment groups. Study device-related TEAEs were reported by 11.3% and 13.1% of subjects in the AI and PFS treatment groups, respectively. Study drug-related TEAEs were reported by 28.3% and 34.6% of subjects in the AI and PFS treatment groups, respectively. Few subjects experienced injection-site reactions, mainly pain and erythema, regardless of the administration method.

CONCLUSION

Delivery of MSB11022 via an AI is bioequivalent to delivery via a PFS. The safety and tolerability profile of MSB11022 was comparable across administration methods. The development of an AI for MSB11022 provides a choice of self-injection devices available to patients, potentially improving treatment compliance.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov trial identifier: NCT04018599.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是证明阿达木单抗拟生物类似药MSB11022通过自动注射器(AI)或预填充注射器(PFS)给药时的生物等效性,并比较其安全性和耐受性。

方法

在这项药代动力学(PK)平行组开放标签研究中,216名健康志愿者按1:1随机分组,接受单次皮下注射40mg/0.8mL剂量的MSB11022,分别通过AI或PFS给药。共同主要PK终点为最大观察浓度(Cmax)、从时间0至最后可定量浓度的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)以及从时间0外推至无穷大的AUC(AUC∞)。如果所有共同主要终点的几何最小二乘均值比的90%置信区间(CIs)完全包含在80-125%的等效范围内,则宣布AI和PFS给药方法之间的PK等效。同时评估安全性和耐受性。

结果

三个共同主要PK终点(Cmax、AUC和AUC∞)的90%CI完全包含在预先定义的80-125%等效范围内。通过AI或PFS注射后的平均血清浓度-时间曲线相似。两个治疗组的治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAEs)具有可比性。AI和PFS治疗组分别有11.3%和13.1%的受试者报告了与研究器械相关的TEAEs。AI和PFS治疗组分别有28.3%和34.6%的受试者报告了与研究药物相关的TEAEs。无论给药方法如何,很少有受试者出现注射部位反应,主要是疼痛和红斑。

结论

MSB11022通过AI给药与通过PFS给药具有生物等效性。MSB11022的安全性和耐受性在不同给药方法之间具有可比性。MSB11022自动注射器的开发为患者提供了自我注射装置的选择,可能会提高治疗依从性。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov试验标识符:NCT04018599。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e5f/8964896/0ae0711cae90/40744_2022_432_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验