Suppr超能文献

一项对被监禁成年男性样本中反刍思维、愤怒反刍、攻击性脚本排练与攻击行为之间关系的研究。

A study of the relationships between rumination, anger rumination, aggressive script rehearsal, and aggressive behavior in a sample of incarcerated adult males.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.

Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 2022 Sep;78(9):1925-1939. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23341. Epub 2022 Mar 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study explored relationships between aggressive script rehearsal, rumination, and anger rumination with aggressive behavior.

METHOD

One hundred and twenty-nine incarcerated males (M = 33.54, SD = 8.67) completed the Schedule of Imagined Violence, Preservative Thinking Questionnaire, Anger Rumination Scale, and the Life History of Aggression-Aggression subscale. Correlations were run to examine associations between the variables and a four-step sequential multiple regression was performed to assess for the unique contribution of rumination, anger rumination, and aggressive script rehearsal to aggressive behavior.

RESULTS

Results revealed moderate-strong positive associations between aggressive script rehearsal, rumination, and anger rumination. Moderate-weak associations were found between these three constructs and aggressive behavior. Regression analyses revealed aggressive script rehearsal was uniquely related with aggressive behavior and path analysis demonstrated aggressive script rehearsal mediated the relationship between rumination/anger rumination and aggression.

CONCLUSION

These results clarify the nature of the relationships between these conceptually connected constructs and suggest that the frequency with which someone rehearses aggressive scripts impacts on the likelihood of aggression more than anger rumination and general ruminative processes. The frequency with which a person rehearses aggressive scripts should be a critical consideration in violence risk assessment and treatment programs for people deemed to be at risk for violent behavior.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨了攻击脚本排练、反刍和愤怒反刍与攻击行为之间的关系。

方法

129 名被监禁的男性(M=33.54,SD=8.67)完成了想象暴力时间表、保护思维问卷、愤怒反刍量表和攻击性生活史-攻击性子量表。进行相关性分析以检验变量之间的关联,然后进行四步顺序多重回归,以评估反刍、愤怒反刍和攻击脚本排练对攻击行为的独特贡献。

结果

结果显示攻击脚本排练、反刍和愤怒反刍之间存在中度到高度的正相关。这三个结构与攻击行为之间存在中度到弱的关联。回归分析显示攻击脚本排练与攻击行为有独特的关系,路径分析表明攻击脚本排练中介了反刍/愤怒反刍与攻击之间的关系。

结论

这些结果阐明了这些概念上相关的结构之间关系的本质,并表明一个人排练攻击脚本的频率比愤怒反刍和一般的反刍过程更能影响攻击的可能性。在对被认为有暴力行为风险的人进行暴力风险评估和治疗计划时,应认真考虑一个人排练攻击脚本的频率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccca/9541888/a57ff59e101a/JCLP-78-1925-g001.jpg

相似文献

4
Aggressive Script Rehearsal in Adult Offenders: Characteristics and Association With Self-Reported Aggression.
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Dec;37(23-24):NP21902-NP21926. doi: 10.1177/08862605211062992. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
5
Anger rumination and imagined violence as related to violent behavior before and after psychiatric hospitalization.
J Clin Psychol. 2022 Sep;78(9):1878-1895. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23334. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
7
9
[French validation of the Anger Rumination Scale].
Encephale. 2013 Oct;39(5):339-46. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.11.006. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
10
Individual differences in anger and displaced aggression: The role of metacognitive beliefs and anger rumination.
Aggress Behav. 2020 Mar;46(2):162-169. doi: 10.1002/ab.21878. Epub 2020 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Childhood Risk Factors for Violent Ideations in Late Adolescence and Early Adulthood.
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2025 Apr;35(2):95-105. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2382. Epub 2025 Mar 22.
3
A critical analysis of stalking theory and implications for research and practice.
Behav Sci Law. 2022 Sep;40(5):562-583. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2598. Epub 2022 Sep 22.

本文引用的文献

2
Patient characteristics associated with aggression in mental health units.
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Apr;250:141-145. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.078. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
3
Rethinking Rumination.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Sep;3(5):400-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x.
4
Rumination and the displacement of aggression in United Kingdom gang-affiliated youth.
Aggress Behav. 2012 Jan-Feb;38(1):89-97. doi: 10.1002/ab.20419.
6
7
The multiple systems model of angry rumination.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2013 May;17(2):103-23. doi: 10.1177/1088868312467086. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
8
The impact of rumination on aggressive thoughts, feelings, arousal, and behaviour.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2011 Jun;50(Pt 2):281-301. doi: 10.1348/014466610X515696. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
9
The Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire (PTQ): validation of a content-independent measure of repetitive negative thinking.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2011 Jun;42(2):225-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.12.003. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
10
Rumination as a transdiagnostic factor in depression and anxiety.
Behav Res Ther. 2011 Mar;49(3):186-93. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.12.006. Epub 2010 Dec 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验