Wilms G E, Baert A L, Staessen J A, Amery A K
Radiology. 1986 Sep;160(3):713-5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.160.3.3526406.
The ability of diagnostic intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IVDSA) to demonstrate the degree of renal artery stenosis was compared with that of intraarterial angiography in 45 patients with 92 arteries. Stenotic lesions on both IVDSA and intraarterial studies were classified as normal (0% stenosis), minor (less than 50%), low grade (50%-80%), and high grade (80%-99%). There was agreement about the degree of stenosis in 90% of the cases. IVDSA grading was correct in 94% of atheromatous lesions and in 56% of the fibromuscular dysplastic lesions. In the high-grade atheromatous lesions, the degree of stenosis was slightly overestimated on IVDSA studies in 22.5% of the cases. In fibromuscular dysplasia, stenosis was underestimated in 33% of the cases.
在45例患者的92条动脉中,对比了诊断性静脉数字减影血管造影(IVDSA)与动脉内血管造影显示肾动脉狭窄程度的能力。IVDSA和动脉内研究中的狭窄病变分为正常(0%狭窄)、轻度(小于50%)、低度(50%-80%)和高度(80%-99%)。90%的病例在狭窄程度上达成一致。IVDSA分级在94%的动脉粥样硬化病变和56%的纤维肌发育不良病变中是正确的。在高度动脉粥样硬化病变中,22.5%的病例在IVDSA研究中狭窄程度被略微高估。在纤维肌发育不良中,33%的病例狭窄程度被低估。