• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威膝关节韧带登记处具有良好的有效性:对 2004 年至 2013 年初次和翻修十字韧带重建的关键变量数据质量的评估。

Good validity in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register: assessment of data quality for key variables in primary and revision cruciate ligament reconstructions from 2004 to 2013.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Førde Central Hospital, Svanehaugvegen 2, 6812, Førde, Norway.

Medical Department, Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 9;23(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05183-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-022-05183-2
PMID:35264137
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8908681/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Norwegian Knee Ligament Register was founded in 2004 to provide representative and reliable data on cruciate ligament surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of key variables in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register to reveal and prevent systematic errors or incompleteness, which can lead to biased reports and study conclusions.

METHOD

We included a stratified cluster sample of 83 patients that had undergone both primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. A total of 166 medical records were reviewed and compared with their corresponding data in the database of the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register. We assessed the validity of a selection of key variables using medical records as a reference standard to compute the positive predictive values of the register data for the variables.

RESULTS

The positive predictive values for the variables of primary and revision surgery ranged from 92 to 100% and from 39 to 100% with a mean positive predictive value of 99% and 88% respectively. Data on intraoperative findings and surgical details had high positive predictive values, ranging from 91 to 100% for both primary and revision surgery. The positive predictive value for the variable "date of injury" was 92% for primary surgeries but only 39% for revision surgeries. The positive predictive value for "activity at the time of injury" was 99% for primary surgeries and 52% for revisions.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the data quality of the key variables examined in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register was high, making the register a valid source for research.

摘要

背景

挪威膝关节韧带注册中心成立于 2004 年,旨在提供有关十字韧带手术的代表性和可靠数据。本研究的目的是评估挪威膝关节韧带注册中心关键变量的有效性,以发现和防止系统误差或不完整,从而导致有偏差的报告和研究结论。

方法

我们纳入了一个分层聚类样本,包括 83 例接受初次和翻修前交叉韧带手术的患者。共审查了 166 份病历,并将其与挪威膝关节韧带注册中心数据库中的相应数据进行了比较。我们使用病历作为参考标准评估了一系列关键变量的有效性,以计算登记数据对这些变量的阳性预测值。

结果

初次和翻修手术的变量的阳性预测值范围分别为 92%至 100%和 39%至 100%,平均阳性预测值分别为 99%和 88%。术中发现和手术细节的数据具有较高的阳性预测值,初次和翻修手术的阳性预测值范围分别为 91%至 100%。“受伤日期”变量的阳性预测值为初次手术的 92%,但翻修手术的仅为 39%。“受伤时的活动”变量的阳性预测值在初次手术中为 99%,在翻修手术中为 52%。

结论

总体而言,挪威膝关节韧带注册中心中检查的关键变量的数据质量较高,使该注册中心成为研究的有效来源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70bb/8908681/a1ba7d73e10f/12891_2022_5183_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70bb/8908681/1af705811c86/12891_2022_5183_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70bb/8908681/a1ba7d73e10f/12891_2022_5183_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70bb/8908681/1af705811c86/12891_2022_5183_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70bb/8908681/a1ba7d73e10f/12891_2022_5183_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Good validity in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register: assessment of data quality for key variables in primary and revision cruciate ligament reconstructions from 2004 to 2013.挪威膝关节韧带登记处具有良好的有效性:对 2004 年至 2013 年初次和翻修十字韧带重建的关键变量数据质量的评估。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 9;23(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05183-2.
2
The Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register: a report on baseline variables and outcomes of surgery for almost 18,000 patients.瑞典国家前交叉韧带登记处:近 18000 例患者手术的基线变量和结果报告。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Oct;40(10):2230-5. doi: 10.1177/0363546512457348. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
3
Surgical Predictors of Early Revision Surgery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register on 13,102 Patients.前交叉韧带重建术后早期翻修手术的手术预测因素:来自瑞典国家膝关节韧带登记处对13102例患者的研究结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):1574-82. doi: 10.1177/0363546514531396. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
4
Predicting Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Revision: A Machine Learning Analysis Utilizing the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register.预测前交叉韧带重建翻修:利用挪威膝关节韧带登记处的机器学习分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Jan 19;104(2):145-153. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00113.
5
Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is superior to single-bundle reconstruction in terms of revision frequency: a study of 22,460 patients from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register.双束前交叉韧带重建在翻修频率方面优于单束重建:来自瑞典国家膝关节韧带登记处的 22460 例患者研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Dec;25(12):3884-3891. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4387-4. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
6
Re-revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Evaluation From the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry.前交叉韧带重建术的再修订:来自挪威膝关节韧带登记处的评估。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Jun;35(6):1695-1701. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.01.027. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
7
Revision surgery in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 17,682 patients from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register.前交叉韧带重建翻修手术:一项对瑞典国家膝关节韧带登记处17682名患者的队列研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 May;25(5):1542-1554. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4399-0. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
8
Intraoperative findings and procedures in culturally and geographically different patient and surgeon populations: an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction registry comparison between Norway and the USA.不同文化和地理背景的患者和外科医生人群中的术中发现和手术过程:挪威和美国前交叉韧带重建登记处比较。
Acta Orthop. 2012 Dec;83(6):577-82. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.741451. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
9
The Effect of Limited Perioperative Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs on Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.围手术期有限使用非甾体抗炎药对前交叉韧带重建患者的影响。
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):3111-3118. doi: 10.1177/0363546516657539. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
10
Graft Diameter as a Predictor for Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and KOOS and EQ-5D Values: A Cohort Study From the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register Based on 2240 Patients.移植物直径作为翻修前交叉韧带重建以及膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS)与欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)值的预测指标:一项基于瑞典国家膝关节韧带登记处2240例患者的队列研究
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(9):2092-2097. doi: 10.1177/0363546517704177. Epub 2017 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of Meniscal and Articular Surface Injuries in Patients Undergoing Primary and Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Analysis.初次和翻修前交叉韧带重建患者半月板和关节面损伤的患病率:一项回顾性分析
Cureus. 2025 May 30;17(5):e85106. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85106. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Rates of Subjective Failure After Both Isolated and Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Study From the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry 2004-2021.孤立后交叉韧带重建和联合后交叉韧带重建后主观失败率:2004-2021 年挪威膝关节韧带登记研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 May;52(6):1491-1497. doi: 10.1177/03635465241238461. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Graft Choice and 6-Year Outcomes of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the MARS Cohort.移植选择与 MARS 队列中 6 年翻修前交叉韧带重建术后结果的相关性。
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Aug;49(10):2589-2598. doi: 10.1177/03635465211027170. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
2
Predictors of clinical outcome following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.翻修前交叉韧带重建术后临床结果的预测因素。
J Orthop Res. 2020 Jun;38(6):1191-1203. doi: 10.1002/jor.24562. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
3
Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstrings and Extra-articular Tenodesis: A Mid- to Long-Term Clinical and Radiological Study.
The Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort treatment algorithm yields superior outcomes to usual care 9-12 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
特拉华-奥斯陆 ACL 队列治疗算法在前交叉韧带重建后 9-12 年提供优于常规护理的结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Feb;32(2):214-222. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12039. Epub 2024 Jan 14.
4
Major Increase in Incidence of Pediatric ACL Reconstructions From 2005 to 2021: A Study From the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register.2005 年至 2021 年,小儿 ACL 重建发生率显著增加:来自挪威膝关节韧带登记处的研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Sep;51(11):2891-2899. doi: 10.1177/03635465231185742. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
5
ACL surgery: reasons for failure and management.前交叉韧带手术:失败原因及处理
EFORT Open Rev. 2023 May 9;8(5):319-330. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0085.
6
Epidemiological profile of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in a tertiary referral trauma center of Nepal.尼泊尔一家三级转诊创伤中心前交叉韧带损伤的流行病学特征。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jun 21;23(1):595. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05551-y.
腘绳肌腱和关节外腱固定术重建前交叉韧带:一项中至长期的临床和放射学研究。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Dec;34(12):3204-3213. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.05.045. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
4
Return to Sport-Specific Performance After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.重返运动:前交叉韧带重建术后的专项运动表现:系统评价。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Nov;46(13):3307-3316. doi: 10.1177/0363546517732541. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
5
Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建翻修术
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Oct 4;99(19):1689-1696. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00412.
6
Causes of Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Revision Surgical Strategies.前交叉韧带重建失败的原因及翻修手术策略
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2016 Dec 1;28(4):319-324. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.16.007.
7
Epidemiology and Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries.前交叉韧带损伤的流行病学与诊断
Clin Sports Med. 2017 Jan;36(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
8
Positive predictive value of cardiovascular diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry: a validation study.丹麦国家患者登记处心血管疾病诊断的阳性预测值:一项验证研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 18;6(11):e012832. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012832.
9
No negative effect on patient-reported outcome of concomitant cartilage lesions 5-9 years after ACL reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建术后5至9年,对患者报告的伴随软骨损伤的预后无负面影响。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 May;25(5):1482-1488. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4163-5. Epub 2016 May 19.
10
Incidence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears and Reconstruction: A 21-Year Population-Based Study.前交叉韧带撕裂与重建的发病率:一项基于人群的21年研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jun;44(6):1502-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546516629944. Epub 2016 Feb 26.