Suppr超能文献

青年对标准残疾调查问题的回应的流行率和模式。

Prevalence and patterns of youth responses to standard disability survey questions.

机构信息

Oregon Health & Science University, Institute on Development and Disability, 707 SW Gaines Street, Portland, OR, 97239, USA; OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, 1810 SW 5th Ave, Portland, OR 97201, USA.

Office of Equity and Inclusion, Oregon Health Authority, 421 SW Oak Street, Suite 750, Portland, OR 97204, USA.

出版信息

Disabil Health J. 2022 Jul;15(3):101280. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2022.101280. Epub 2022 Feb 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2011, the US Department of Health and Human Services adopted a minimum set of six standardized questions about disability to be used in population-based health surveys. These questions have been validated for self- and proxy-report use by adults, but how they perform for adolescents is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To describe how 8th grade students, 11th grade students, and young adults aged 18-24 years in Oregon answer these questions.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study design. Data for the 8th and 11th grade students were derived from the Oregon Health Teens survey (OHT; 2017 and 2019); data for young adults aged 18-24 were from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS; 2017 and 2018). Unweighted counts, weighted proportions and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for socio-demographic characteristics, the six disability questions, and overall disability status (yes/no) among 8th graders (n = 14,396), 11th graders (n = 23,517), and young adults (n = 1112).

RESULTS

Responses for 8th and 11th grade students were materially consistent for all six questions. Young adults were markedly less likely to report cognitive disability compared to 8th and 11th graders (17.2% vs. 24.9% and 27.0%, respectively) and somewhat less likely to report an independent living disability (6.5% vs. 8.6% and 9.8%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Differences in cognitive disabilities between adolescents and young adults may either be due to differences in underlying impairment or the result of youth interpreting this question differently than adults. Validation of the standardized disability identifiers for self-report in adolescents is needed.

摘要

背景

2011 年,美国卫生与公众服务部采用了一套包含六个标准化问题的最小集合,用于基于人群的健康调查。这些问题已经过验证,可用于成年人的自我报告和代理报告,但对于青少年的表现情况尚不清楚。

目的

描述俄勒冈州八年级学生、十一年级学生和 18-24 岁的年轻人如何回答这些问题。

方法

采用横断面研究设计。八年级和十一年级学生的数据来自俄勒冈州健康青少年调查(OHT;2017 年和 2019 年);18-24 岁的年轻人数据来自行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS;2017 年和 2018 年)。对社会人口统计学特征、六个残疾问题以及八年级学生(n=14396)、十一年级学生(n=23517)和年轻人(n=1112)的总体残疾状况(是/否)进行了加权计数、加权比例和 95%置信区间的计算。

结果

八年级和十一年级学生对所有六个问题的回答基本一致。与八年级和十一年级学生相比,年轻人报告认知残疾的可能性明显较低(分别为 17.2%、24.9%和 27.0%),报告独立生活残疾的可能性也略低(分别为 6.5%、8.6%和 9.8%)。

结论

青少年和年轻人之间认知残疾的差异可能是由于潜在的损伤不同,也可能是因为年轻人对这个问题的解释与成年人不同。需要对青少年自我报告的标准化残疾标识符进行验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验