Schulz Jonathan A, Hall Jean P, West Julia C, Glasser Allison M, Bourne Dana E, Delnevo Cristine D, Villanti Andrea C
Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Prev Med Rep. 2024 May 23;43:102770. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102770. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Disability is identified in surveys using various question sets, with little understanding of reliability across these measures, nor how these estimates may vary across age groups, including adolescents and young adults (AYA). The purpose of this study was to assess AYA prevalence of disability using two disability question sets and reliability of these measures.
AYA participants in the Policy and Communication Evaluation (PACE) Vermont Study completed a single-item disability question used in the National Survey on Health and Disability (NSHD) and Urban Institute's Health Reform Monitoring Survey (HRMS) and a six-item set on functioning (Washington Group-Short Set, WG-SS) from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) in 2021. Prevalence was estimated for any disability and each disability domain in adolescents (ages 12-17) and young adults (ages 18-25) and compared with U.S. national estimates in NHIS and NSDUH.
Using the WG-SS, the prevalence of any disability was 17.0 % in PACE Vermont adolescents and 22.0 % in young adults, consistent with the national prevalence of adolescents in NSDUH (17.9 %) but higher than estimates of young adults in NHIS (3.9 %) and NSDUH (12.9 %). The single-item question provided lower estimates of disability (adolescents: 6.9 %; young adults: 18.5 %) than the WG-SS, with low positive agreement between measures.
The prevalence of disability in AYAs varies depending on measures used. To improve disability surveillance, it may be necessary to validate new disability questions, including among AYAs, to capture a broader range of disability domains.
在调查中使用各种问题集来识别残疾情况,但对这些测量方法的可靠性以及这些估计值在不同年龄组(包括青少年和青年,即AYA)中的差异了解甚少。本研究的目的是使用两种残疾问题集评估AYA的残疾患病率以及这些测量方法的可靠性。
参与佛蒙特州政策与沟通评估(PACE)研究的AYA参与者在2021年完成了一项用于全国健康与残疾调查(NSHD)和城市研究所健康改革监测调查(HRMS)的单项残疾问题,以及一项来自国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)和国家药物使用与健康调查(NSDUH)的关于功能的六项问题集(华盛顿小组简表,WG-SS)。估计了青少年(12 - 17岁)和青年(18 - 25岁)中任何残疾以及每个残疾领域的患病率,并与NHIS和NSDUH中的美国全国估计值进行比较。
使用WG-SS,PACE佛蒙特州青少年中任何残疾的患病率为17.0%,青年中为22.0%,与NSDUH中青少年的全国患病率(17.9%)一致,但高于NHIS(3.9%)和NSDUH(12.9%)中青年的估计值。单项问题得出的残疾估计值(青少年:6.9%;青年:18.5%)低于WG-SS,且两种测量方法之间的阳性一致性较低。
AYA中残疾的患病率因所使用的测量方法而异。为了改善残疾监测,可能有必要验证新的残疾问题,包括在AYA中,以涵盖更广泛的残疾领域。