Suppr超能文献

实施术后加速康复计划后开放性根治性子宫切除术的结果

Outcomes of open radical hysterectomy following implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery program.

作者信息

Agusti Nuria, Zorrilla Vaca Andrés, Segarra-Vidal Blanca, Iniesta Maria D, Mena Gabriel, Pareja Rene, Dos Reis Ricardo, Ramirez Pedro T

机构信息

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 Apr 4;32(4):480-485. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003244.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Open surgery has become the standard approach for radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 IA1 with lymphovascular space invasion-IIA1). Our primary objective was to compare the length of stay in patients undergoing open radical hysterectomy before and after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program.

METHODS

This was a single center, retrospective, before-and-after intervention study including patients who underwent open radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer from January 2009 to December 2020. Two groups were identified based on the time of ERAS implementation: pre-ERAS group included patients who were operated on between January 2009 and October 2014; post-ERAS group included patients who underwent surgery between November 2014 and December 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients were included, of whom 29 patients were in the pre-ERAS group and 52 patients in the post-ERAS group. Both groups had similar clinical characteristics with no differences in terms of median age (42 years (interquartile range (IQR) 35-53) in pre-ERAS group vs 41 years (IQR 35-49) in post-ERAS group; p=0.47) and body mass index (26.1 kg/m (IQR 24.6-29.7) in pre-ERAS group vs 27.1 kg/m (IQR 23.5-33.5) in post-ERAS group; p=0.44). Patients in the post-ERAS group were discharged from the hospital earlier compared with those in the pre-ERAS group (median 3 days (IQR 2-3) vs 4 (IQR 3-4), p<0.01). The proportion of patients discharged within 48 hours was significantly higher in the post-ERAS group (47.3% vs 17.3%, p=0.013). There were no differences regarding either overall complications (44.8% pre-ERAS vs 38.5% post-ERAS; p=0.57) or readmission rates within 30 days (20.7% pre-ERAS group vs 17.3% ERAS group; p=0.40). Adherence to the ERAS pathway since its implementation in 2014 has remained stable with a median of 70% (IQR 65%-75%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing open radical hysterectomy on an ERAS pathway have a shorter length of hospital stay without increasing overall complications or readmissions rates.

摘要

目的

开放手术已成为早期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术的标准术式(国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)2018年IA1期伴脉管间隙浸润-IIA1期)。我们的主要目的是比较实施加速康复外科(ERAS)计划前后接受开放性根治性子宫切除术患者的住院时间。

方法

这是一项单中心、回顾性、干预前后对照研究,纳入2009年1月至2020年12月期间接受开放性宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术的患者。根据ERAS实施时间分为两组:ERAS前组包括2009年1月至2014年10月接受手术的患者;ERAS后组包括2014年11月至2020年12月接受手术的患者。

结果

共纳入81例患者,其中ERAS前组29例,ERAS后组52例。两组临床特征相似,中位年龄无差异(ERAS前组为42岁(四分位间距(IQR)35 - 53)vs ERAS后组为41岁(IQR 35 - 49);p = 0.47),体重指数也无差异(ERAS前组为26.1 kg/m²(IQR 24.6 - 29.7)vs ERAS后组为27.1 kg/m²(IQR 23.5 - 33.5);p = 0.44)。与ERAS前组患者相比,ERAS后组患者出院更早(中位时间3天(IQR 2 - 3)vs 4天(IQR 3 - 4),p < 0.01)。ERAS后组48小时内出院患者比例显著更高(47.3% vs 17.3%,p = 0.013)。总体并发症(ERAS前组为44.8% vs ERAS后组为38.5%;p = 0.57)及30天内再入院率(ERAS前组为20.7% vs ERAS组为17.3%;p = 0.40)均无差异。自2014年实施以来,ERAS路径的依从性保持稳定,中位数为70%(IQR 65% - 75%)。

结论

接受ERAS路径开放性根治性子宫切除术的患者住院时间更短,且未增加总体并发症或再入院率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验