González Rueda Juan Ramón, García Ávila Irene, de Paz Hermoso Víctor Manuel, Riad Deglow Elena, Zubizarreta-Macho Álvaro, Pato Mourelo Jesús, Montero Martín Javier, Hernández Montero Sofía
Department of Implant Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X El Sabio University, 28691 Madrid, Spain.
Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Quiron Health Hospital, 28002 Madrid, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 5;11(5):1436. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051436.
The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the accuracy of zygomatic dental implant (ZI) placement carried out using a dynamic navigation system. Materials and Methods: Forty (40) ZIs were randomly distributed into one of two study groups: (A) ZI placement via a computer-aided dynamic navigation system (n = 20) (navigation implant (NI)); and (B) ZI placement using a conventional free-hand technique (n = 20) (free-hand implant (FHI)). A cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan of the existing situation was performed preoperatively to plan the surgical approach for the computer-aided study group. Four zygomatic dental implants were placed in anatomically based polyurethane models (n = 10) manufactured by stereolithography, and a postoperative CBCT scan was performed. Subsequently, the preoperative planning and postoperative CBCT scans were added to dental implant software to analyze the coronal entry point, apical end point, and angular deviations. Results were analyzed using the Student’s t-test. Results: The results showed statistically significant differences in the apical end-point deviations between FHI and NI (p = 0.0018); however, no statistically significant differences were shown in the coronal entry point (p = 0.2617) or in the angular deviations (p = 0.3132). Furthermore, ZIs placed in the posterior region showed more deviations than the anterior region at the coronal entry point, apical end point, and angular level. Conclusions: The conventional free-hand technique enabled more accurate placement of ZIs than the computer-assisted surgical technique. In addition, placement of ZIs in the anterior region was more accurate than that in the posterior region.
本体外研究的目的是评估和比较使用动态导航系统进行颧骨种植体(ZI)植入的准确性。材料与方法:40颗ZI被随机分为两个研究组之一:(A)通过计算机辅助动态导航系统植入ZI(n = 20)(导航种植体(NI));(B)使用传统徒手技术植入ZI(n = 20)(徒手种植体(FHI))。术前对现有情况进行锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT),以规划计算机辅助研究组的手术入路。在通过立体光刻制造的基于解剖结构的聚氨酯模型(n = 10)中植入四颗颧骨种植体,并进行术后CBCT扫描。随后,将术前规划和术后CBCT扫描添加到牙种植体软件中,以分析冠状入口点、根尖端点和角度偏差。使用学生t检验分析结果。结果:结果显示FHI和NI在根尖端点偏差上存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.0018);然而,在冠状入口点(p = 0.2617)或角度偏差(p = 0.3132)方面未显示出统计学显著差异。此外,在冠状入口点、根尖端点和角度水平上,位于后部区域的ZI比前部区域表现出更多偏差。结论:传统徒手技术比计算机辅助手术技术能更准确地植入ZI。此外,ZI在前部区域的植入比在后部区域更准确。