Tabernée Heijtmeijer Sander, Glas Haye, Janssen Nard, Vosselman Nathalie, de Visscher Sebastiaan, Spijkervet Fred, Raghoebar Gerry, de Bree Remco, Rosenberg Antoine, Witjes Max, Kraeima Joep
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
3D-Lab, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
PeerJ. 2024 Dec 9;12:e18468. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18468. eCollection 2024.
Placement of zygomatic implants in the most optimal prosthetic position is considered challenging due to limited bone mass of the zygoma, limited visibility, length of the drilling path and proximity to critical anatomical structures. Augmented reality (AR) navigation can eliminate some of the disadvantages of surgical guides and conventional surgical navigation, while potentially improving accuracy. In this human cadaver study, we evaluated a developed AR navigation approach for placement of zygomatic implants after total maxillectomy.
The developed AR navigation interface connects a commercial navigation system with the Microsoft HoloLens. AR navigated surgery was performed to place 20 zygomatic implants using five human cadaver skulls after total maxillectomy. To determine accuracy, postoperative scans were virtually matched with preoperative three-dimensional virtual surgical planning, and distances in mm from entry-exit points and angular deviations were calculated as outcome measures. Results were compared with a previously conducted study in which zygomatic implants were positioned with 3D printed surgical guides.
The mean entry point deviation was 2.43 ± 1.33 mm and a 3D angle deviation of 5.80 ± 4.12° (range 1.39-19.16°). The mean exit point deviation was 3.28 mm (±2.17). The abutment height deviation was on average 2.20 ± 1.35 mm. The accuracy of the abutment in the occlusal plane was 4.13 ± 2.53 mm. Surgical guides perform significantly better for the entry-point ( = 0.012) and 3D angle ( = 0.05); however, there is no significant difference in accuracy for the exit-point ( = 0.143) when using 3D printed drill guides or AR navigated surgery.
Despite the higher precision of surgical guides, AR navigation demonstrated acceptable accuracy, with potential for improvement and specialized applications. The study highlights the feasibility of AR navigation for zygomatic implant placement, offering an alternative to conventional methods.
由于颧骨骨量有限、可视性受限、钻孔路径长度以及与关键解剖结构接近,将颧骨种植体置于最理想的修复位置被认为具有挑战性。增强现实(AR)导航可以消除手术导板和传统手术导航的一些缺点,同时可能提高准确性。在这项人体尸体研究中,我们评估了一种用于全上颌骨切除术后颧骨种植体植入的AR导航方法。
所开发的AR导航界面将商业导航系统与微软HoloLens连接起来。在全上颌骨切除术后,使用五个尸体头骨进行AR导航手术,植入20颗颧骨种植体。为了确定准确性,将术后扫描结果与术前三维虚拟手术规划进行虚拟匹配,并计算出入点和出点的毫米距离以及角度偏差作为结果指标。将结果与之前一项使用3D打印手术导板定位颧骨种植体的研究进行比较。
平均入点偏差为2.43±1.33毫米,三维角度偏差为5.80±4.12°(范围1.39 - 19.16°)。平均出点偏差为3.28毫米(±2.17)。基台高度偏差平均为2.20±1.35毫米。基台在咬合平面的准确性为4.13±2.53毫米。手术导板在入点(P = 0.012)和三维角度(P = 0.05)方面表现明显更好;然而,使用3D打印钻孔导板或AR导航手术时,出点准确性没有显著差异(P = 0.143)。
尽管手术导板精度更高,但AR导航显示出可接受的准确性,具有改进和特殊应用的潜力。该研究突出了AR导航用于颧骨种植体植入的可行性,为传统方法提供了一种替代方案。