Cardiovascular Research Institute, School of Medicine San Francisco, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 5;19(5):3053. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19053053.
The tobacco industry's efforts to undermine clean indoor air policies in the hospitality industry, public spaces and workspaces is well documented, but less is known about their efforts to respond to the implementation of smoke-free policies in multi-unit housing (MUH). From 1988 to 2018, public and private multi-unit housing properties voluntarily implemented smoke-free polices in their buildings. We searched the UCSF's Truth Tobacco Industry Documents Library to examine whether the tobacco industry responded to the implementation of these smoke-free policies in MUH using the same strategies they deployed to respond to smoke-free policies in other industries. We found that the tobacco industry used two primary strategies to respond to smoke-free policies in multi-unit housing: (1) distortion, which included funding studies that downplayed the link between SHS and asthma among low-income, inner-city MUH residents; and (2) deflection, which included engaging in corporate responsibility for youth living in low-income MUH. Despite these efforts, local jurisdictions continued to voluntarily implement smoke-free policies in MUH, pointing to a potential counter strategy to the tobacco industry influence.
烟草业在酒店业、公共场所和工作场所破坏清洁室内空气政策的努力有案可稽,但人们对其应对多户住宅(MUH)实施无烟政策的努力知之甚少。从 1988 年到 2018 年,公共和私人多户住宅物业自愿在其建筑物内实施无烟政策。我们搜索了 UCSF 的 Truth Tobacco Industry Documents Library,以检查烟草业是否使用与应对其他行业无烟政策相同的策略来应对 MUH 中的这些无烟政策。我们发现,烟草业使用了两种主要策略来应对多户住宅中的无烟政策:(1)扭曲,包括资助研究,淡化低收入城市 MUH 居民中 SHS 与哮喘之间的联系;(2)转移,包括为居住在低收入 MUH 的年轻人承担企业责任。尽管做出了这些努力,地方司法管辖区仍继续自愿在 MUH 实施无烟政策,这表明可能存在对抗烟草业影响的对策。