• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发性膜性肾病中血清抗 PLA2R 抗体的最佳值:一项多中心观察性研究。

Optimal Value for Serum Anti-PLA2R Antibody in Primary Membranous Nephropathy: A Multicenter Observational Study.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China.

Department of Nephrology, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Am J Nephrol. 2022;53(2-3):129-138. doi: 10.1159/000521836. Epub 2022 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1159/000521836
PMID:35272286
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibody (PLA2R-Ab) is highly specific for primary membranous nephropathy (PMN). Here, we compare the diagnostic value of different circulating PLA2R-Ab cutoff titers in multicenter cohorts, with particular focus on determining the optimal cutoff value for Chinese patients.

METHODS

In total, 288 patients with PMN and 301 with other nephropathies were recruited retrospectively from five hospitals in China between September 2011 and October 2018. PLA2R-Ab in serum obtained at renal biopsy was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of PLA2R-Ab in diagnosing PMN were assessed. Diagnostic efficiency was evaluated by internal validation.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and Youden index for PMN diagnosis were 71%, 90%, 88%, 75%, and 0.61 at the cutoff of 3.8 RU/mL; 74%, 86%, 84%, 76%, and 0.60 at 2.7 RU/mL; 68%, 92%, 90%, 73%, and 0.60 at 5.2 RU/mL; 64%, 95%, 93%, 72%, and 0.59 at 9.0 RU/mL; 57%, 96%, 94%, 68%, and 0.54 at 14.0 RU/mL; 51%, 97%, 95%, 66%, and 0.49 at 20.0 RU/mL; 47%, 98%, 96%, 64%, and 0.45 at 40.0 RU/mL, respectively. The area under the ROC curve was 0.83.

CONCLUSION

By comprehensively considering specificity and sensitivity, we show that 3.8 RU/mL is the optimal cutoff of PLA2R-Ab in Chinese PMN patients, with a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 90%. The cutoff values were 5.2 RU/mL and 9.0 RU/mL when the diagnostic specificity was increased to 92% and 95%, respectively.

摘要

简介

抗磷脂酶 A2 受体抗体(PLA2R-Ab)对原发性膜性肾病(PMN)具有高度特异性。在这里,我们比较了不同循环 PLA2R-Ab 截断滴度在多中心队列中的诊断价值,特别关注确定中国患者的最佳截断值。

方法

回顾性收集 2011 年 9 月至 2018 年 10 月中国五家医院 288 例 PMN 患者和 301 例其他肾病患者的临床资料。采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测血清中 PLA2R-Ab。评估 PLA2R-Ab 诊断 PMN 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。通过内部验证评估诊断效率。

结果

以 3.8 RU/mL 为截断值时,PMN 诊断的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV 和约登指数分别为 71%、90%、88%、75%和 0.61;2.7 RU/mL 时为 74%、86%、84%、76%和 0.60;5.2 RU/mL 时为 68%、92%、90%、73%和 0.60;9.0 RU/mL 时为 64%、95%、93%、72%和 0.59;14.0 RU/mL 时为 57%、96%、94%、68%和 0.54;20.0 RU/mL 时为 51%、97%、95%、66%和 0.49;40.0 RU/mL 时为 47%、98%、96%、64%和 0.45。ROC 曲线下面积为 0.83。

结论

综合考虑特异性和敏感性,我们发现 PLA2R-Ab 在 3.8 RU/mL 时对中国 PMN 患者的诊断具有最佳的敏感性(71%)和特异性(90%),当诊断特异性提高到 92%和 95%时,截断值分别为 5.2 RU/mL 和 9.0 RU/mL。

相似文献

1
Optimal Value for Serum Anti-PLA2R Antibody in Primary Membranous Nephropathy: A Multicenter Observational Study.原发性膜性肾病中血清抗 PLA2R 抗体的最佳值:一项多中心观察性研究。
Am J Nephrol. 2022;53(2-3):129-138. doi: 10.1159/000521836. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
2
Diagnostic accuracy of anti-phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibodies in idiopathic membranous nephropathy: an Italian experience.抗磷脂酶A2受体(PLA2R)抗体在特发性膜性肾病中的诊断准确性:一项意大利的经验。
J Nephrol. 2021 Apr;34(2):573-579. doi: 10.1007/s40620-020-00888-w. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
3
The optimal anti-phospholipase A2 receptor cutoff for the diagnosis of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a single-center retrospective study.抗磷脂酶 A2 受体最佳截断值在特发性膜性肾病诊断中的应用:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Korean J Intern Med. 2022 Jan;37(1):154-166. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2020.366. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
4
Serum anti-PLA2R antibody as a diagnostic biomarker of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: The optimal cut-off value for Chinese patients.血清抗 PLA2R 抗体作为特发性膜性肾病的诊断生物标志物:中国患者的最佳截断值。
Clin Chim Acta. 2018 Jan;476:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
5
Can use of the serum anti-PLA2R antibody negate the need for a renal biopsy in primary membranous nephropathy?在原发性膜性肾病中,血清抗 PLA2R 抗体的检测能否排除进行肾活检的必要性?
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0281726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281726. eCollection 2023.
6
Diagnostic efficacy of serum anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibodies for idiopathic membranous nephropathy in patients with diabetic kidney disease.血清抗磷脂酶 A2 受体抗体对糖尿病肾病患者特发性膜性肾病的诊断效能。
Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Mar;502:222-226. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
7
Pre-transplant phospholipase A2 receptor autoantibody concentration is associated with clinically significant recurrence of membranous nephropathy post-kidney transplantation.移植前磷脂酶A2受体自身抗体浓度与肾移植后膜性肾病具有临床意义的复发相关。
Clin Transplant. 2016 Apr;30(4):461-9. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12711. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
8
The cutoff value and prognosis of anti-PLA2R antibody for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a single-center retrospective study in China.抗 PLA2R 抗体对特发性膜性肾病的诊断界值及预后价值:中国单中心回顾性研究。
Ren Fail. 2023;45(2):2253922. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2253922. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
9
Anti-PLA2R Antibodies in Chinese Patients with Membranous Nephropathy.中国膜性肾病患者中的抗磷脂酶A2受体抗体
Med Sci Monit. 2016 May 15;22:1630-6. doi: 10.12659/msm.896090.
10
Anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibody screening in nephrotic syndrome may identify a distinct subset of patients with primary membranous nephropathy.在肾病综合征中进行抗磷脂酶A2受体抗体筛查可能会识别出原发性膜性肾病患者的一个独特亚组。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2022 Jul;54(7):1713-1723. doi: 10.1007/s11255-021-03061-9. Epub 2021 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
PLA2R autoantibodies, a multifaceted biomarker in nephrotic syndrome and membranous nephropathy.PLA2R自身抗体,一种在肾病综合征和膜性肾病中具有多方面作用的生物标志物。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2025 Aug 1;40(8):1458-1469. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfaf012.