Suppr超能文献

安哥拉西南部地区的氡和钍射气浓度:剂量评估及对风险测绘的影响

Radon and thoron concentrations in the southwest region of Angola: dose assessment and implications for risk mapping.

作者信息

Baptista Edson, Pereira Alcides J S C, Domingos Filipa P, Sêco Sérgio L R

机构信息

Department of Earth Sciences, LRN - Laboratory of Natural Radioactivity, University of Coimbra, Pole II, Rua Sílvio Lima, 3030-790, Coimbra, Portugal.

Department of Earth Sciences, CITEUC - Center for Earth and Space Research, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

Environ Geochem Health. 2023 Mar;45(3):665-686. doi: 10.1007/s10653-022-01226-8. Epub 2022 Mar 11.

Abstract

Indoor radon (Rn) and thoron (Rn) are the most important natural sources of ionizing radiation to the public. Radiological studies that assess simultaneously Rn and Rn, and their controlling factors are particularly scarce in African countries. Hence, we conducted a survey of indoor Rn and Rn in buildings located in the SW region of Angola. Bedrock samples were also collected, and a borehole was executed to assess Ra and Ra activity concentration, Rn and Rn exhalation and emanation potential in the surface and at depth. The aim of this study was to determine the factors (geological and anthropogenic) that may influence the annual inhalation dose (AID) received by the population. Overall, the sum of indoor radon and indoor thoron concentrations, labelled the total indoor radon concentration (TIRC), was higher than 300 Bq/m in only 5% of the buildings studied. The contribution of Rn to the TIRC averaged 35% but may reach 95%, demonstrating the relevance of discriminating radon and thoron in indoor radon surveys. Indoor Rn and Rn were not correlated, indicating both must be estimated to properly assess the AID. Indoor Rn concentrations were statistically different according to the building materials and type of usage. Higher Rn and Rn concentrations were observed in dwellings compared to workplaces. The median AID estimated for dwellings was 1.50 mSv/y compared to 0.26 mSv/y for workplaces, which are lower than the estimated average radiation exposure due to natural sources of 2.4 mSv/y. AID values higher than 1 mSv/y effective dose threshold established in the Council Directive 2013/59/EURATOM for the purpose of radiation protection in workplaces were observed in 12% of the workplaces studied suggesting the need for mitigation measures in those buildings. The analysis of bedrock samples revealed statistically significant correlations between and Ra activity concentration, and Rn and Rn exhalation and emanation potential. The borehole samples indicated a strong influence of weathering processes in the distribution of radioisotopes. The highest Ra and Ra activity concentration, and Rn and Rn exhaled per unit mass, TIRC and AID were observed in association with A-type red granites and porphyries. We conclude that both geological and anthropic factors, such as the type of building usage and building materials, must be considered in dose assessment studies and for the development of risk maps.

摘要

室内氡(Rn)和钍射气(Rn)是公众最重要的天然电离辐射源。在非洲国家,同时评估Rn和Rn及其控制因素的放射学研究尤为匮乏。因此,我们对安哥拉西南部地区建筑物内的室内Rn和Rn进行了调查。还采集了基岩样本,并实施了一个钻孔,以评估地表和地下深处的镭(Ra)和镭(Ra)活度浓度、Rn和Rn的析出率以及射气潜力。本研究的目的是确定可能影响人群年吸入剂量(AID)的因素(地质和人为因素)。总体而言,在仅5%的被研究建筑物中,标记为总室内氡浓度(TIRC)的室内氡和室内钍射气浓度之和高于300 Bq/m³。Rn对TIRC的贡献平均为35%,但可能达到95%,这表明在室内氡调查中区分氡和钍射气的重要性。室内Rn和Rn不相关,这表明两者都必须进行估算,以便正确评估AID。根据建筑材料和使用类型,室内Rn浓度在统计学上存在差异。与工作场所相比,住宅中观察到更高的Rn和Rn浓度。住宅的AID中位数估计为1.50 mSv/y,而工作场所为0.26 mSv/y,低于天然源估计的平均辐射暴露量2.4 mSv/y。在12%的被研究工作场所中观察到AID值高于欧盟理事会指令2013/59/EURATOM为工作场所辐射防护目的设定的1 mSv/y有效剂量阈值,这表明这些建筑物需要采取缓解措施。基岩样本分析揭示了 与Ra活度浓度以及Rn和Rn析出率与射气潜力之间具有统计学意义的相关性。钻孔样本表明风化过程对放射性同位素分布有强烈影响。与A型红色花岗岩和斑岩相关联时,观察到最高的Ra和Ra活度浓度、每单位质量呼出的Rn和Rn、TIRC以及AID。我们得出结论,在剂量评估研究和风险地图绘制中,必须考虑地质和人为因素,如建筑物使用类型和建筑材料。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验