Suppr超能文献

技术偏差:冷却速率的差异使得安瓿瓶无法成为大量干细胞冷冻保存的可靠指标。

A technical bias: differences in cooling rates prevent ampoules from being a reliable index of stem cell cryopreservation in large volumes.

作者信息

Douay L, Lopez M, Gorin N C

出版信息

Cryobiology. 1986 Aug;23(4):296-301. doi: 10.1016/0011-2240(86)90035-0.

Abstract

Ampoule tests are commonly used as an index of the cryopreservation efficiency of marrow stem cells in bags. We have studied the recovery of hematopoietic progenitor cells (CFU-GM, BFUe) in 52 ampoules and compared it to the recovery in 83 standard bags. Our data showed significantly deficient CFU-GM and BFUe recoveries (respectively 47 +/- 31% and 31 +/- 30%) in ampoules when compared to bags (respectively 72 +/- 22% and 64 +/- 19%; P less than 0.001). Moreover, a good progenitor cell recovery (greater than or equal to 50%) was observed in only 46% of frozen ampoules versus 100% observed in frozen bags (P less than 0.05). We were able to relate this nonoptimal recovery to an excessively rapid freezing rate of -9 degrees C/min following the release of fusion heat which occurred in ampoules, while the freezing rate was constantly maintained at -2 degrees C/min in the corresponding bags. We therefore conclude that the cooling conditions have to be carefully controlled to ensure that the bags and ampoules are both cooled under the same conditions. Otherwise, ampoules would not be a reliable index of the true progenitor cells' cryopreservation efficiency in bags.

摘要

安瓿瓶测试通常用作袋装骨髓干细胞冷冻保存效率的指标。我们研究了52个安瓿瓶中造血祖细胞(CFU-GM、BFUe)的回收率,并将其与83个标准袋中的回收率进行了比较。我们的数据显示,与袋子相比,安瓿瓶中CFU-GM和BFUe的回收率明显不足(分别为47±31%和31±30%),袋子中的回收率分别为72±22%和64±19%;P<0.001)。此外,仅46%的冷冻安瓿瓶中观察到良好的祖细胞回收率(≥50%),而冷冻袋中的这一比例为100%(P<0.05)。我们发现这种不理想的回收率与安瓿瓶中融合热释放后-9℃/min的过快冷冻速率有关,而相应袋子中的冷冻速率则一直保持在-2℃/min。因此,我们得出结论,必须仔细控制冷却条件,以确保袋子和安瓿瓶在相同条件下冷却。否则,安瓿瓶将不是袋装真正祖细胞冷冻保存效率的可靠指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验