J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 May-Jun;62(3):674-682.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.02.004. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
Uterine fibroids constitute a significant health problem in the United States, affecting upward of 11 million people.
Characterize the literature regarding the incidence of amenorrhea and reductions in abnormal uterine bleeding and fibroid size and to report on clinically relevant safety outcomes of oral medications that may be used to manage symptomatic uterine fibroids to assist in choice of therapeutic options.
A literature search was conducted through December 31, 2021, using Embase, MEDLINE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts databases. Primary literature reporting on safety or efficacy data of any oral medication for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids was included. Relevant study characteristics, outcomes, and safety data were extracted. Data extraction was performed in duplicate with any discordant data reconciled by the entire investigative team.
A total of 41 studies met inclusion criteria-28 randomized control trials (RCTs), 11 prospective observational studies, 1 phase-1 pharmacokinetic study, and 1 pooled study. The majority of literature involved the study of mifepristone (n = 26, [63.4%]), followed by vilaprisan (n = 5, [12.2%]), elagolix (n = 5, [12.2%]), relugolix (n = 4, [9.8%]), and linzagolix (n = 1 [2.4%]). A total of 33 articles (80.5%) reported results pertaining to the efficacy objectives of this review with all medications statistically significantly improving at least one of these domains. Hot flashes, liver function test abnormalities, and endometrial hyperplasia were the most often reported adverse events. Of the RCTs, 7 of 28 (25%) had a moderate-high risk of bias (RoB), whereas 10 of 11 (90.9%) observational studies had a moderate-high RoB. The majority of moderate-high RoB studies involved the study of mifepristone (15 of 18, 83.3%).
Given higher quality of evidence, confirmed therapeutic efficacy, and a milder adverse effect profile, the contemporary gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonists (elagolix, relugolix, linzagolix) and vilaprisan represent preferred oral treatment options for the management of uterine fibroids.
在美国,子宫肌瘤是一个严重的健康问题,影响了超过 1100 万人。
描述有关闭经、异常子宫出血减少以及肌瘤大小缩小的文献,并报告可能用于治疗症状性子宫肌瘤的口服药物的临床相关安全性结果,以帮助选择治疗方案。
通过 Embase、MEDLINE 和国际药学文摘数据库进行文献检索,检索时间截至 2021 年 12 月 31 日。纳入报告任何口服药物治疗症状性子宫肌瘤的安全性或疗效数据的主要文献。提取相关研究特征、结局和安全性数据。如果数据存在分歧,则由整个研究小组进行重复提取,然后进行数据协调。
共有 41 项研究符合纳入标准,其中 28 项为随机对照试验(RCT)、11 项为前瞻性观察性研究、1 项为 1 期药代动力学研究和 1 项为汇总研究。大多数文献涉及米非司酮(n=26,[63.4%])的研究,其次是维拉帕利森(n=5,[12.2%])、埃拉戈利克斯(n=5,[12.2%])、瑞卢戈利克斯(n=4,[9.8%])和林扎戈利克斯(n=1,[2.4%])。共有 33 篇文章(80.5%)报告了与本综述疗效目标相关的结果,所有药物在至少一个领域均有统计学意义上的改善。热潮红、肝功能试验异常和子宫内膜增生是最常报告的不良事件。在 RCT 中,28 项中的 7 项(25%)具有中度高偏倚风险(RoB),而 11 项观察性研究中的 10 项(90.9%)具有中度高 RoB。大多数中度高 RoB 研究涉及米非司酮(18 项中的 15 项,83.3%)。
鉴于更高质量的证据、已确认的治疗效果以及更温和的不良反应谱,当代促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂(埃拉戈利克斯、瑞卢戈利克斯、林扎戈利克斯)和维拉帕利森代表了治疗子宫肌瘤的首选口服治疗选择。