Tsugu Toshimitsu, Tanaka Kaoru, Belsack Dries, Devos Hannes, Nagatomo Yuji, Michiels Vincent, Argacha Jean-François, Cosyns Bernard, Buls Nico, De Maeseneer Michel, De Mey Johan
Department of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Int J Cardiol. 2022 May 15;355:59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.03.005. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
In significant obstructive coronary artery disease (SOCAD), a mismatch in assessment of severity of coronary artery stenosis may occur between invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and computed tomography (CT) derived fractional flow reserve (FFR). The present study aimed to identify the factors giving an FFR > 0.80 and leading to an underestimation of coronary artery severity in SOCAD vessels.
A total of 141 consecutive patients who underwent both CT angiography including FFR and ICA, the latter showing >75% coronary artery stenosis were evaluated. Vessels were divided into two groups according to FFR at the distal aspect of the vessel: FFR > 0.80 (n = 12) and FFR ≤ 0.80 (n = 153). Vessel morphology, plaque characteristics, left-ventricular (LV) wall thickness at each site of the myocardium, and LV mass were also assessed.
LV myocardium-related parameters including LV wall thickness (base, middle, apex, average, and maximal), LV mass, and LV mass index were higher in FFR > 0.80, whereas vessel-related parameters including, vessel morphology and plaque characteristics were not significantly different between >0.80 and < 0.80. Vessel morphology and plaque characteristics had no effect on FFR, whereas maximum LV wall thickness, LV mass, and LV mass index influenced FFR. LV mass index was the strongest predictor of distal FFR > 0.80 with an area under the curve of 0.81, and an optimal cut-off value of 66.5 g/m (sensitivity 77.8%, specificity 89.6%).
The presence of a high LV mass is a major cause for underestimation of coronary artery severity on FFR in SOCAD vessels. LV myocardium-related parameters should be considered when interpreting numerical values of FFR.
在严重阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(SOCAD)中,侵入性冠状动脉造影(ICA)与计算机断层扫描(CT)衍生的血流储备分数(FFR)之间可能在冠状动脉狭窄严重程度评估上出现不匹配。本研究旨在确定导致FFR>0.80并致使SOCAD血管中冠状动脉严重程度被低估的因素。
总共评估了141例连续接受包括FFR的CT血管造影和ICA检查的患者,后者显示冠状动脉狭窄>75%。根据血管远端的FFR将血管分为两组:FFR>0.80(n = 12)和FFR≤0.80(n = 153)。还评估了血管形态、斑块特征、心肌各部位左心室(LV)壁厚度以及LV质量。
FFR>0.80组中与左心室心肌相关的参数,包括左心室壁厚度(基部、中部、心尖、平均和最大)、左心室质量和左心室质量指数较高,而血管相关参数,包括血管形态和斑块特征在FFR>0.80和<0.80组之间无显著差异。血管形态和斑块特征对FFR无影响,而最大左心室壁厚度、左心室质量和左心室质量指数影响FFR。左心室质量指数是远端FFR>0.80的最强预测因子,曲线下面积为0.81,最佳截断值为66.5 g/m(敏感性77.8%,特异性89.6%)。
左心室质量高是SOCAD血管中FFR低估冠状动脉严重程度的主要原因。在解释FFR数值时应考虑左心室心肌相关参数。