Li Lin, Chen Chuan, Liu Chaojun, Niu Li, Pan Chunguo
Department of Thoracic Oncology, Jiangxi Tumor Hospital, Nanchang, China.
Shenzhen Cheerland Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Feb;10(4):214. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-358.
The tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a promising biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). However, its relationships with clinical parameters have not been fully explored. We aimed to assess potential factors including age, microsatellite instability (MSI) state, tumor types, and gene mutations that might influence TMB value through analyzing 1,504 tissue samples and 496 blood samples from cancer patients.
The TMB value of individual samples was calculated by whole-exome sequencing (WES) analysis and major cancer-related gene mutations were evaluated using panel sequencing. MSI was detected with MSI analysis system.
The results showed that for blood samples, compared to age 1 (age ≤56 years old) or age 2 (56< age <68 years old) groups, the TMB value in the age 3 group (age ≥68 years old) was significantly higher. The MSI ratio (%) had no linear correlation with TMB, and a significant difference of TMB between Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) other alterations and p.G12 alteration was identified. For tissue samples, compared to age 1 (age ≤53 years old), TMB was higher in the age 2 (53< age <65 years old) group and lower in the age 3 (age ≥65 years old) group. MSI ratio (%) had no linear correlation with TMB. Significant differences in TMB were discovered between adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC), lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) samples. TMB among KRAS p.G12A, p.G12C, p.G12D, p.G12R, p.G12S, p.G12V, and other KRAS alterations were observed in tissue samples.
In conclusion, analysis of age, tumor types, and KRAS mutations may provide a relative effectivity for estimating TMB.
肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)是免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)一个很有前景的生物标志物。然而,其与临床参数之间的关系尚未得到充分研究。我们旨在通过分析1504份癌症患者的组织样本和496份血液样本,评估可能影响TMB值的潜在因素,包括年龄、微卫星不稳定性(MSI)状态、肿瘤类型和基因突变。
通过全外显子组测序(WES)分析计算个体样本的TMB值,并使用靶向测序评估主要癌症相关基因突变。使用MSI分析系统检测MSI。
结果显示,对于血液样本,与年龄1组(年龄≤56岁)或年龄2组(56<年龄<68岁)相比,年龄3组(年龄≥68岁)的TMB值显著更高。MSI比率(%)与TMB无线性相关性,并且在 Kirsten 大鼠肉瘤病毒癌基因同源物(KRAS)的其他改变与p.G12改变之间发现了TMB的显著差异。对于组织样本,与年龄1组(年龄≤53岁)相比,年龄2组(53<年龄<65岁)的TMB更高,而年龄3组(年龄≥65岁)的TMB更低。MSI比率(%)与TMB无线性相关性。在腺鳞癌(ASC)、肺腺癌(LUAD)、肺鳞癌(LUSC)、非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)和小细胞肺癌(SCLC)样本之间发现了TMB的显著差异。在组织样本中观察到了KRAS p.G12A、p.G12C、p.G12D、p.G12R、p.G12S、p.G12V以及其他KRAS改变之间的TMB情况。
总之,对年龄、肿瘤类型和KRAS突变的分析可能为估计TMB提供相对有效性。