Wu Tao, Li Sha, Ren Jing, Wang Dun, Ai Yanran
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Feb;10(4):165. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-295.
Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is recurrent local myofascial pain with various treatment methods. In recent years, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has attracted much attention, but its role still lacks systematic review. We included controlled clinical studies for meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the application effect of ESWT.
The English literature from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science to October 2021 was searched by computer. After screening, the quality was evaluated by the PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) scale and analyzed by RevMan 5.4 software.
A total of 571 patients were included in 8 studies. The MPS pain sites of 541 patients were in the neck and upper back, and only 30 patients had pain sites in the waist. Meta-analysis showed that the pain level after ESWT was lower than that after other treatment methods [mean difference (MD) =-1.34, 95% confidential interval (CI): -1.87 to -0.81, P<0.00001], the pain threshold after ESWT was higher than that after other treatment methods (MD =0.90, 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.07, P<0.00001), and the neck disability index after ESWT was lower (MD =-1.79, 95% CI: -2.48 to -1.10, P<0.00001).
ESWT can avoid the adverse effects of invasive procedures on patient tolerance and compliance; compared with trigger point injection (TPI), dry needling, ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency (US), and other methods, ESWT can more effectively relieve pain in patients with MPS.
肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)是一种伴有多种治疗方法的复发性局部肌筋膜疼痛。近年来,体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)备受关注,但其作用仍缺乏系统评价。我们纳入对照临床研究进行荟萃分析,以系统评价ESWT的应用效果。
通过计算机检索截至2021年10月PubMed、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库及Web of Science中的英文文献。筛选后,采用PEDro(物理治疗证据数据库)量表评估质量,并使用RevMan 5.4软件进行分析。
8项研究共纳入571例患者。541例患者的MPS疼痛部位在颈部和上背部,仅30例患者的疼痛部位在腰部。荟萃分析显示,ESWT后的疼痛水平低于其他治疗方法[平均差(MD)=-1.34,95%置信区间(CI):-1.87至-0.81,P<0.00001],ESWT后的疼痛阈值高于其他治疗方法(MD =0.90,95%CI:0.73至1.07,P<0.00001),且ESWT后的颈部功能障碍指数更低(MD =-1.79,95%CI:-2.48至-1.10,P<0.00001)。
ESWT可避免侵入性操作对患者耐受性和依从性的不良影响;与触发点注射(TPI)、干针穿刺、超声引导下脉冲射频(US)等方法相比,ESWT能更有效地缓解MPS患者的疼痛。