Suppr超能文献

重复注射 1%利多卡因与桡动脉体外冲击波治疗肌筋膜触发点的效果:一项随机对照试验。

Effects of Repeated Injection of 1% Lidocaine vs. Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Treating Myofascial Trigger Points: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Guishan District, Taoyuan City 33343, Taiwan.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 26;58(4):479. doi: 10.3390/medicina58040479.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: This study tested the hypothesis that treatment of myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in the upper trapezius muscle (UTM) with repeated injection of 1% lidocaine results in better alleviation of muscular stiffness and soreness as well as improved metabolism in the hypercontracted MTrP area than treatment with radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT). Materials and Methods: A single-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted on patients suffering from MTrPs in the UTM. Thirty patients were treated with repeated injection of 2 mL of 1% lidocaine (three injections; one injection per week). Another 30 patients were treated with rESWT (three treatment sessions; one treatment session per week; 2000 radial extracorporeal shock waves per treatment session; positive energy flux density = 0.10 mJ/mm2). The primary outcome measure was pain severity using the VAS score. The secondary outcome measures included muscle elasticity index, pressure pain threshold and neck disability index. Evaluation was performed at baseline (T1), 15−30 min after the first treatment in order to register immediate treatment effects (T2), before the second treatment (i.e., one week after baseline) (T3) and one week after the third treatment (i.e., four weeks after baseline) (T4). Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the primary and secondary outcome measures between the patients in the lidocaine arm and the patients in the rESWT arm at T1 and T4. Within the arms, the mean differences of all outcomes were statistically significant (p < 0.001) when comparing the data obtained at T1 with the data obtained at T3 and the data obtained at T4. Conclusions: The results of this pilot study suggest that the use of rESWT in patients with MTrPs in the UTM is safe and leads to reduced pain and improved muscle elasticity, pressure pain threshold and neck disability index, without adverse effects. Larger trials are necessary to verify this. Clinicians should consider rESWT instead of injections of lidocaine in the treatment of MTrPs in the UTM.

摘要

背景和目的

本研究旨在验证以下假设,即与放射状体外冲击波治疗(rESWT)相比,重复注射 1%利多卡因治疗上斜方肌(UTM)中的肌筋膜触发点(MTrP)可更好地缓解肌肉僵硬和酸痛,并改善高收缩 MTrP 区域的代谢。

材料和方法

对患有 UTM 中 MTrP 的患者进行了一项单盲、前瞻性、随机对照试验。30 名患者接受了 2 毫升 1%利多卡因的重复注射(三次注射;每周一次)。另外 30 名患者接受了 rESWT(三次治疗;每周一次;每次治疗 2000 次放射状体外冲击波;正能通量密度=0.10 mJ/mm2)。主要观察指标为视觉模拟评分(VAS)的疼痛严重程度。次要观察指标包括肌肉弹性指数、压痛阈值和颈部残疾指数。评估在基线(T1)时进行,第一次治疗后 15-30 分钟进行即刻治疗效果评估(T2),第二次治疗前(即基线后一周)(T3)和第三次治疗后一周(即基线后四周)(T4)进行。

结果

在 T1 和 T4 时,利多卡因组和 rESWT 组患者的主要和次要观察指标之间没有统计学差异。在各个组内,当比较 T1 时获得的数据与 T3 和 T4 时获得的数据时,所有结果的平均值差异均具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。

结论

这项初步研究的结果表明,在 UTM 中的 MTrP 患者中使用 rESWT 是安全的,可减轻疼痛并改善肌肉弹性、压痛阈值和颈部残疾指数,且无不良反应。需要更大规模的试验来验证这一点。临床医生在治疗 UTM 中的 MTrP 时应考虑 rESWT 而非利多卡因注射。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5ee/9027125/f362d8fc7970/medicina-58-00479-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验