Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Section for Clinical Biometrics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Front Immunol. 2022 Feb 25;13:843452. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.843452. eCollection 2022.
Pre-sensitized kidney transplant recipients have a higher risk for rejection following kidney transplantation and therefore receive lymphodepletional induction therapy with anti-human T-lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) whereas non-sensitized patients are induced in many centers with basiliximab. The time course of lymphocyte reconstitution with regard to the overall and donor-reactive T-cell receptor (TCR) specificity remains elusive.
METHODS/DESIGN: Five kidney transplant recipients receiving a 1.5-mg/kg ATLG induction therapy over 7 days and five patients with 2 × 20 mg basiliximab induction therapy were longitudinally monitored. Peripheral mononuclear cells were sampled pre-transplant and within 1, 3, and 12 months after transplantation, and their overall and donor-reactive TCRs were determined by next-generation sequencing of the TCR beta CDR3 region. Overall TCR repertoire diversity, turnover, and donor specificity were assessed at all timepoints.
We observed an increase in the donor-reactive TCR repertoire after transplantation in patients, independent of lymphocyte counts or induction therapy. Donor-reactive CD4 T-cell frequency in the ATLG group increased from 1.14% + -0.63 to 2.03% + -1.09 and from 0.93% + -0.63 to 1.82% + -1.17 in the basiliximab group in the first month. Diversity measurements of the entire T-cell repertoire and repertoire turnover showed no statistical difference between the two induction therapies. The difference in mean clonality between groups was 0.03 and 0.07 pre-transplant in the CD4 and CD8 fractions, respectively, and was not different over time (CD4: F(1.45, 11.6) = 0.64 p = 0.496; CD8: F(3, 24) = 0.60 p = 0.620). The mean difference in R20, a metric for immune dominance, between groups was -0.006 in CD4 and 0.001 in CD8 T-cells and not statistically different between the groups and subsequent timepoints (CD4: F(3, 24) = 0.85 p = 0.479; CD8: F(1.19, 9.52) = 0.79 p = 0.418).
Reduced-dose ATLG induction therapy led to an initial lymphodepletion followed by an increase in the percentage of donor-reactive T-cells after transplantation similar to basiliximab induction therapy. Furthermore, reduced-dose ATLG did not change the overall TCR repertoire in terms of a narrowed or skewed TCR repertoire after immune reconstitution, comparable to non-depletional induction therapy.
致敏的肾移植受者在肾移植后发生排斥反应的风险较高,因此接受抗人 T 淋巴细胞球蛋白(ATLG)的淋巴细胞耗竭诱导治疗,而非致敏患者在许多中心接受巴利昔单抗诱导治疗。关于整体和供体反应性 T 细胞受体(TCR)特异性的淋巴细胞重建时间过程仍然难以捉摸。
方法/设计:五名接受 1.5mg/kg ATLG 诱导治疗 7 天的肾移植受者和五名接受 2×20mg 巴利昔单抗诱导治疗的患者进行了纵向监测。在移植前和移植后 1、3 和 12 个月采集外周血单核细胞,并通过 TCRβ CDR3 区的下一代测序确定其整体和供体反应性 TCR。在所有时间点评估整体 TCR 库多样性、周转率和供体特异性。
我们观察到,无论淋巴细胞计数或诱导治疗如何,移植后患者的供体反应性 TCR 库都会增加。ATLG 组的供体反应性 CD4 T 细胞频率从 1.14%±0.63 增加到 2.03%±1.09,巴利昔单抗组从 0.93%±0.63 增加到 1.82%±1.17,第一个月。整个 T 细胞库的多样性测量和库周转率在两种诱导治疗之间没有统计学差异。两组之间的平均克隆性差异分别为 0.03 和 0.07,在 CD4 和 CD8 分数中,并且随时间变化没有差异(CD4:F(1.45,11.6)=0.64 p=0.496;CD8:F(3,24)=0.60 p=0.620)。组间 R20(衡量免疫优势的指标)的平均差异在 CD4 中为-0.006,在 CD8 中为 0.001,在组间和随后的时间点均无统计学差异(CD4:F(3,24)=0.85 p=0.479;CD8:F(1.19,9.52)=0.79 p=0.418)。
低剂量 ATLG 诱导治疗导致初始淋巴细胞耗竭,随后在移植后供体反应性 T 细胞的百分比增加,类似于巴利昔单抗诱导治疗。此外,低剂量 ATLG 并没有改变整体 TCR 库,即在免疫重建后 TCR 库没有变窄或倾斜,与非耗竭性诱导治疗相当。