Suppr超能文献

Bioavailability and pharmacological effects of two slow-release theophylline preparations: intrasubject tablet-to-tablet variability.

作者信息

Rivera-Calimlim L, Calimlim J F, Liang R, Lasagna L, Diamond G L

出版信息

J Asthma. 1986;23(3):113-22. doi: 10.3109/02770908609077485.

Abstract

The bioavailability and pharmacological effects of slow-release preparations oxtriphylline (Choledyl SA) and anhydrous theophylline (Theo-Dur) were compared in a single-blind, randomized, crossover study in 10 normal men. Subjects were administered three doses from the same lot of each preparation at weekly intervals. Plasma concentration of theophylline was measured at timed intervals for 33 hr by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that Choledyl SA peaked earlier (4.7 +/- 1.0 hr) than did Theo-Dur (9.6 +/- 8.2 hr), with higher peak concentrations, 6.4 +/- 0.7 micrograms/ml versus 4.1 +/- 0.5 micrograms/ml for Theo-Dur, and greater are under the curve, 102.4 +/- 15.7 micrograms/ml X hr versus 75.3 +/- 9.1 micrograms/ml X hr for Theo-Dur. 88% absorption was achieved in 6 hr with Choledyl SA versus 10 hr with Theo-Dur. Wide intra- and intersubject variations were observed with both preparations. Likewise, variable effects on systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse were observed with both preparations. The effects of both theophylline preparations on urine flow, osmolar clearance, and glomerular filtration rate were compared. Osmotic diuresis without detectable changes in the glomerular filtration rate was observed in subjects who received Choledyl SA versus Theo-Dur. Differences in the bioavailability and renal effects were observed between Choledyl SA and Theo-Dur. Wide intra- and intersubject tablet-to-tablet variability were observed with both preparations.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验