Suppr超能文献

经脐单孔加一孔机器人辅助手术治疗儿童胆总管囊肿:与腹腔镜辅助手术的比较

Trans-umbilical Single-Site Plus One Robotic Assisted Surgery for Choledochal Cyst in Children, a Comparing to Laparoscope-Assisted Procedure.

作者信息

Lin Shan, Chen Jianglong, Tang Kunbin, He Yufeng, Xu Xinru, Xu Di

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.

Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2022 Feb 25;10:806919. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.806919. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We introduce the trans-umbilical single-site plus one robotic-assisted surgery for the treatment of pediatric choledochal cyst. Compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between the new method and traditional laparoscopy-assisted procedure.

METHOD

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 51 children diagnosed with choledochal cysts and received surgery from June 2019 to December 2020 at our department. About 24 patients who underwent the robot-assisted procedure were selected as the R group, and 27 patients who underwent the laparoscope-assisted procedure were selected as the L group. We compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between the two groups.

RESULT

No significant differences were found in demographic information between the two groups ( > 0.05). The median total operative time, median port/trocar installation time, and median wound suture time of the R group were a little longer than the L group (217.63 ± 5.90 vs. 199.37 ± 5.13 min; 30.71 ± 3.18 vs. 6.11 ± 1.15 min; 30.79 ± 1.82 vs. 20.40 ± 3.12 min, respectively; < 0.001). However, the R group had shorter choledochal cyst excision time and mean hepaticojejunostomy anastomosis time than the L group (52.04 ± 2.74 vs. 59.26 ± 3.23 min; 52.42 ± 2.72 vs. 60.63 ± 3.30 min, respectively, < 0.001). The mean extracorporeal Roux-y jejunojejunostomy time of two groups has no remarkable difference ( > 0.05). The R group also had less mean volume of blood loss (7.04 ± 1.16 vs. 29.04 ± 18.21 mL; < 0.001). The R group had a shorter indwelling time of gastric tube, anal exhaust time, water feeding time, solids feeding time, and hospital stay time than the L group ( < 0.05). The R group had a lower early complication rate than the L group (4.2 vs. 29.63%; = 0.026). No statistical differences were identified between the two groups in late or any single complication (0.00 vs. 11.11%; > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A resection of the choledochal cyst and a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy can be performed much more precisely by single-site plus one robotic-assisted surgery. Patients can achieve rapid recovery, and the umbilical incision is more concealed and beautiful. Combing the experience of single-site surgery with robot-assisted surgery, the operators can implement the technique in children safely and feasibly.

摘要

目的

我们介绍经脐单孔加一机器人辅助手术治疗小儿胆总管囊肿。比较新方法与传统腹腔镜辅助手术的术中及术后结果。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2019年6月至2020年12月在我科诊断为胆总管囊肿并接受手术的51例儿童的临床资料。选择24例行机器人辅助手术的患者作为R组,27例行腹腔镜辅助手术的患者作为L组。我们比较两组的术中及术后结果。

结果

两组的人口统计学信息无显著差异(>0.05)。R组的中位总手术时间、中位端口/套管安装时间和中位伤口缝合时间比L组略长(分别为217.63±5.90 vs. 199.37±5.13分钟;30.71±3.18 vs. 6.11±1.15分钟;30.79±1.82 vs. 20.40±3.12分钟,<0.001)。然而,R组的胆总管囊肿切除时间和平均肝空肠吻合时间比L组短(分别为52.04±2.74 vs. 59.26±3.23分钟;52.42±2.72 vs. 60.63±3.30分钟,<0.001)。两组的平均体外Roux-y空肠空肠吻合时间无显著差异(>0.05)。R组的平均失血量也较少(7.04±1.16 vs. 29.04±18.21毫升,<0.001)。R组的胃管留置时间、肛门排气时间、进水时间、进固体食物时间和住院时间比L组短(<0.05)。R组的早期并发症发生率低于L组(4.2% vs. 29.63%,=0.026)。两组在晚期或任何单一并发症方面无统计学差异(0.00% vs. 11.11%,>0.05)。

结论

单孔加一机器人辅助手术能更精确地进行胆总管囊肿切除和Roux-en-Y肝空肠吻合术。患者可实现快速康复,脐部切口更隐蔽美观。将单孔手术经验与机器人辅助手术相结合,手术者可安全可行地在儿童中实施该技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a13/8914220/cc64aa296a06/fped-10-806919-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验