• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Bayesian Approaches for Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model.使用广义分级展开模型检测项目功能差异的贝叶斯方法。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 Mar;46(2):98-115. doi: 10.1177/01466216211066606. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
2
Differential Item Functioning Analyses of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Measures: Methods, Challenges, Advances, and Future Directions.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS®)测评的项目区分度分析:方法、挑战、进展及未来方向。
Psychometrika. 2021 Sep;86(3):674-711. doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09775-0. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
3
The Explanatory Generalized Graded Unfolding Model: Incorporating Collateral Information to Improve the Latent Trait Estimation Accuracy.解释性广义分级展开模型:纳入辅助信息以提高潜在特质估计准确性。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 Jan;46(1):3-18. doi: 10.1177/01466216211051717. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
4
Use of Information Criteria in the Study of Group Differences in Trace Lines.信息准则在痕迹线组间差异研究中的应用
Appl Psychol Meas. 2019 Mar;43(2):95-112. doi: 10.1177/0146621618772292. Epub 2018 May 15.
5
Power and Type I Error of the Mean and Covariance Structure Analysis Model for Detecting Differential Item Functioning in Graded Response Items.用于检测等级反应项目中项目功能差异的均值和协方差结构分析模型的功效与I型错误
Multivariate Behav Res. 2006 Mar 1;41(1):29-53. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4101_3.
6
Item Response Theory With Covariates (IRT-C): Assessing Item Recovery and Differential Item Functioning for the Three-Parameter Logistic Model.带协变量的项目反应理论(IRT-C):评估三参数逻辑斯蒂模型的项目恢复与项目功能差异
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Feb;76(1):22-42. doi: 10.1177/0013164415579488. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
7
A Monte Carlo Study of an Iterative Wald Test Procedure for DIF Analysis.用于差异项目功能分析的迭代 Wald 检验程序的蒙特卡罗研究。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Jan;77(1):104-118. doi: 10.1177/0013164416637104. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
8
A comparison of methods to address item non-response when testing for differential item functioning in multidimensional patient-reported outcome measures.多维患者报告结局测量中测试差异项目功能时处理项目无反应的方法比较。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Sep;31(9):2837-2848. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03129-8. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
9
Item Parameter Estimation With the General Hyperbolic Cosine Ideal Point IRT Model.使用广义双曲余弦理想点IRT模型进行项目参数估计。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2019 Jan;43(1):18-33. doi: 10.1177/0146621618758697. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
10
Multidimensional Extension of Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes Models to Detect DIF.用于检测差异项目功能的多指标多原因模型的多维扩展
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Aug;77(4):545-569. doi: 10.1177/0013164416651116. Epub 2016 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Detecting DIF with the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise Preference Model: Lord's Chi-square and IPR-NCDIF Methods.使用多维度成对偏好模型检测差异项目功能:洛德卡方检验和IPR-NCDIF方法。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2025 Jul 1:01466216251351949. doi: 10.1177/01466216251351949.

本文引用的文献

1
Item Parameter Estimation With the General Hyperbolic Cosine Ideal Point IRT Model.使用广义双曲余弦理想点IRT模型进行项目参数估计。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2019 Jan;43(1):18-33. doi: 10.1177/0146621618758697. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
2
Evaluating Anchor-Item Designs for Concurrent Calibration With the GGUM.评估用于与广义通用单维模型(GGUM)同时校准的锚定项目设计。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 Mar;41(2):83-96. doi: 10.1177/0146621616673997. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
3
MIMIC Methods for Detecting DIF Among Multiple Groups: Exploring a New Sequential-Free Baseline Procedure.多组间检测差异项目功能(DIF)的MIMIC方法:探索一种新的无序列基线程序。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 Oct;40(7):486-499. doi: 10.1177/0146621616659738. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
4
Examining the Process of Responding to Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values Items: Should Ideal Point Scoring Methods Be Considered?审视对人际价值观项目环形量表的回应过程:是否应考虑理想点计分方法?
J Pers Assess. 2016;98(3):310-8. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1077852. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
5
Bayesian tests of measurement invariance.测量不变性的贝叶斯检验
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2013 Nov;66(3):383-401. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02059.x. Epub 2012 Oct 5.
6
Effect size indices for analyses of measurement equivalence: understanding the practical importance of differences between groups.分析测量等效性的效应大小指标:了解组间差异的实际重要性。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Sep;96(5):966-80. doi: 10.1037/a0022955.
7
Analysis of differential item functioning in the depression item bank from the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS): An item response theory approach.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)抑郁项目库中项目差异功能分析:一种项目反应理论方法。
Psychol Sci Q. 2009;51(2):148-180.
8
Fitting measurement models to vocational interest data: are dominance models ideal?将测量模型应用于职业兴趣数据:主导模型是理想之选吗?
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Sep;94(5):1287-304. doi: 10.1037/a0015899.
9
Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: toward a unified strategy.运用验证性因素分析和项目反应理论检测项目功能差异:迈向统一策略
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(6):1292-306. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1292.
10
Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring?审视人格评估中关于项目反应的假设:量表开发和计分是否应考虑理想点法?
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Jan;91(1):25-39. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.25.

使用广义分级展开模型检测项目功能差异的贝叶斯方法。

Bayesian Approaches for Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using the Generalized Graded Unfolding Model.

作者信息

Joo Seang-Hwane, Lee Philseok, Stark Stephen

机构信息

The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.

George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.

出版信息

Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 Mar;46(2):98-115. doi: 10.1177/01466216211066606. Epub 2022 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1177/01466216211066606
PMID:35281341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8908411/
Abstract

Differential item functioning (DIF) analysis is one of the most important applications of item response theory (IRT) in psychological assessment. This study examined the performance of two Bayesian DIF methods, Bayes factor (BF) and deviance information criterion (DIC), with the generalized graded unfolding model (GGUM). The Type I error and power were investigated in a Monte Carlo simulation that manipulated sample size, DIF source, DIF size, DIF location, subpopulation trait distribution, and type of baseline model. We also examined the performance of two likelihood-based methods, the likelihood ratio (LR) test and Akaike information criterion (AIC), using marginal maximum likelihood (MML) estimation for comparison with past DIF research. The results indicated that the proposed BF and DIC methods provided well-controlled Type I error and high power using a free-baseline model implementation, their performance was superior to LR and AIC in terms of Type I error rates when the reference and focal group trait distributions differed. The implications and recommendations for applied research are discussed.

摘要

项目功能差异(DIF)分析是项目反应理论(IRT)在心理评估中最重要的应用之一。本研究使用广义分级展开模型(GGUM)检验了两种贝叶斯DIF方法——贝叶斯因子(BF)和偏差信息准则(DIC)的性能。在一个蒙特卡洛模拟中研究了I型错误率和检验功效,该模拟对样本量、DIF来源、DIF大小、DIF位置、亚群体特质分布和基线模型类型进行了操控。我们还使用边际极大似然估计(MML)来检验两种基于似然的方法——似然比(LR)检验和赤池信息准则(AIC)的性能,以便与以往的DIF研究进行比较。结果表明,所提出的BF和DIC方法在使用自由基线模型实现时,能很好地控制I型错误率并具有较高的检验功效,当参照组和目标组特质分布不同时,它们在I型错误率方面的表现优于LR和AIC。讨论了对应用研究的启示和建议。