Taha Amr
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, GBR.
Paediatric and Special Care Dentistry, City Health Care Partnership (CHCP) Dental Services, Hull, GBR.
Cureus. 2022 Feb 8;14(2):e22008. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22008. eCollection 2022 Feb.
Undergraduates and postgraduates frequently receive feedback on their clinical and non-clinical performance and progression throughout their studies and career. Good quality feedback has been shown to improve trainees' confidence and performance. This article discusses the benefits of feedback and reviews the communication, technical, financial, and networking barriers to feedback introduced by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and its impact on the quality of medical and dental education in the UK, followed by a critical reflection. In addition, it reviews the pros and cons of self-assessment of clinical learning, and it provides an overview of the most widely accepted feedback models: Pendleton's rules, SET-GO method, agenda-led, outcome-based analysis (ALOBA) model and Prepare to Ask-Discuss-Ask-Plan Together (Prepare to ADAPT) on the quality of feedback received. The aim is to identify the most suitable feedback method to help trainees with their clinical and professional development during the COVID-19 pandemic and any possible pandemics in the future.
本科生和研究生在整个学习和职业生涯中经常会收到关于他们临床和非临床表现及进展的反馈。高质量的反馈已被证明能提高学员的信心和表现。本文讨论了反馈的益处,并审视了2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)所带来的反馈在沟通、技术、财务和网络方面的障碍及其对英国医学和牙科教育质量的影响,随后进行批判性反思。此外,本文还回顾了临床学习自我评估的利弊,并概述了最广泛接受的反馈模型:彭德尔顿规则、SET-GO方法、议程主导、基于结果的分析(ALOBA)模型以及“准备提问-讨论-提问-共同规划”(准备适应)模型,以评估所收到反馈的质量。目的是确定最合适的反馈方法,以在COVID-19大流行及未来任何可能的大流行期间帮助学员进行临床和专业发展。