Riswari Silvita Fitri, Budiman Muhammad Fitriandi, Darmayanti Dera, Prodjosoewojo Susantina, Susandi Evan, Oehadian Amaylia, Alisjahbana Bachti
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.
Research Center for Care and Control of Infectious Diseases, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia.
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Mar 5;15:2589-2595. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S343017. eCollection 2022.
Practical methods for detecting plasma leakage should be readily available in all areas where dengue is endemic. We compared the accuracy of measurements obtained with a handheld HemoCue Hb 201 instrument used for hemoglobin point-of-care testing (Hb-POCT) with that of measurements of hematocrit (Ht) levels for detecting plasma leakage in dengue patients.
We performed both measurements using the HemoCue Hb201 system and microhematocrit method on EDTA blood taken from dengue patients at three time points during their hospitalization. Ascites, pleural effusion, or gallbladder thickening determined through ultrasound examinations were considered the gold standard for determining dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) versus dengue fever (DF).
Close agreement between Hb-POCT and Ht measurements was indicated by an r square value of 0.845 in a linear regression. The sensitivity results for distinguishing between DHF and DF at admission were similar for Hb-POCT (63.6%) and Ht (66.7%) (Kappa = 0.75) using the optimal cutoff point determined via ROC analysis. Delta differences (in percentage) for Hb-POCT and Ht between the highest and lowest values showed lower sensitivity (45.5% and 48.5%, respectively; Kappa 0.60) when the optimal cutoff point was applied. Recommended cutoffs of ≥20% to confirm plasma leakage provided a slightly higher sensitivity using Hb-POCT (18.2%) compared with the sensitivity obtained using Ht (15.2%) with Kappa value of 97.9%.
Our results showed that the accuracy of Hb POCT measurements was similar and not inferior to Ht measurements for detecting plasma leakage in patients with DHF. We recommend that further evaluations are conducted to determine the optimal cutoff point given the low sensitivity associated with using ≥20% Hb-POCT or Ht increases to determine hemoconcentration.
在所有登革热流行地区都应具备实用的血浆渗漏检测方法。我们比较了用于血红蛋白即时检测(Hb-POCT)的手持式HemoCue Hb 201仪器所测结果与血细胞比容(Ht)水平测量结果在检测登革热患者血浆渗漏方面的准确性。
我们使用HemoCue Hb201系统和微量血细胞比容法,对登革热患者住院期间三个时间点采集的乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)抗凝血进行了这两项测量。通过超声检查确定的腹水、胸腔积液或胆囊增厚被视为区分登革出血热(DHF)和登革热(DF)的金标准。
线性回归中r平方值为0.845,表明Hb-POCT与Ht测量结果高度一致。使用通过ROC分析确定的最佳截断点时,入院时区分DHF和DF的灵敏度结果,Hb-POCT为63.6%,Ht为66.7%(Kappa = 0.75)。应用最佳截断点时,Hb-POCT和Ht在最高值与最低值之间的差异百分比(以百分比表示)显示出较低的灵敏度(分别为45.5%和48.5%;Kappa 0.60)。推荐的用于确认血浆渗漏的截断值≥20%,使用Hb-POCT时的灵敏度(18.2%)略高于使用Ht时的灵敏度(15.2%),Kappa值为97.9%。
我们的结果表明,在检测DHF患者的血浆渗漏方面,Hb POCT测量的准确性与Ht测量相似且不逊色。鉴于使用≥20%的Hb-POCT或Ht升高来确定血液浓缩时灵敏度较低,我们建议进行进一步评估以确定最佳截断点。