Department of Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Centre, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Department of Ultrasound, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Centre, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):9647-9653. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2050362. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
To report the frequency of maternal mosaicism contributing to false-positive chromosome X loss associated with noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) at a single center.
Pregnancies undergone NIPT using massively parallel sequencing at Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center between February 2015 and May 2020 were included in this study. Fetal karyotyping, quantitative fluorescence PCR (QF-PCR) or microarray analysis was provided to patients with abnormal sex chromosomal aneuploidy (SCA) results for confirmatory testing, and QF-PCR was also employed to detect maternal sex chromosome status.
cffDNA testing of 40682 pregnancies revealed 86 cases with NIPT results positive for chromosome X loss (0.21%). Among the 86 high-risk cases, 73 women had undergone confirmatory testing in our center, whereas 13 declined. Of the 73 women verified by invasive prenatal diagnosis, 27.4% (20/73) were true positive cases including six cases of monosomy X, two cases of microdeletion of Xp22.33, one case of deletion Xq27.2q28, one case of 47, XXX and ten cases with fetal sex chromosome mosaicism. Of the remaining 53 patients with fetal normal results, 30 cases had undergone QF-PCR analysis of maternal white blood cells. QF-PCR indicated that 36.7% (11/30) patients had an altered or mosaic maternal sex chromosome status. Statistical analysis indicated that cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) concentration estimated by chromosome X in maternal mosaic cases was significantly higher than that in the non-maternal mosaicism group ( < .05) and was related to maternal mosaicism rate ( = 0.88, < .05).
Our findings indicated that maternal mosaicism of sex chromosome was not uncommon in false-positive NIPT chromosome X loss cases. We recommend that this information should be disclosed to pregnancies during clinical counseling and maternal sex chromosome status should be confirmed for the cases with NIPT chromosome X loss.
报告在单一中心,非侵入性产前检测(NIPT)中与 X 染色体丢失相关的假阳性结果中母体嵌合体的频率。
本研究纳入了 2015 年 2 月至 2020 年 5 月在广州妇女儿童医疗中心接受使用大规模平行测序的 NIPT 的妊娠。对性染色体非整倍体(SCA)结果异常的患者提供胎儿核型分析、定量荧光 PCR(QF-PCR)或微阵列分析进行确认性检测,并且还使用 QF-PCR 检测母体性染色体状态。
对 40682 例妊娠的 cffDNA 检测显示,86 例 NIPT 结果阳性提示 X 染色体丢失(0.21%)。在 86 例高风险病例中,73 例在本中心进行了确认性检测,而 13 例拒绝检测。在通过有创性产前诊断验证的 73 名女性中,27.4%(20/73)为真正的阳性病例,包括 6 例单体 X、2 例 Xp22.33 微缺失、1 例 Xq27.2q28 缺失、1 例 47,XXX 和 10 例胎儿性染色体嵌合体。在其余 53 例胎儿正常的患者中,有 30 例进行了母体白细胞 QF-PCR 分析。QF-PCR 表明,36.7%(11/30)患者的母体性染色体状态发生改变或呈嵌合体。统计学分析表明,母体嵌合体病例中 X 染色体估计的游离胎儿 DNA(cffDNA)浓度明显高于非母体嵌合体组( < .05),且与母体嵌合体率相关( = 0.88, < .05)。
我们的研究结果表明,在假阳性 NIPT X 染色体丢失病例中,性染色体母体嵌合体并不罕见。我们建议在临床咨询中向妊娠告知这些信息,并对 NIPT X 染色体丢失的病例确认母体性染色体状态。