Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels 1090, Belgium.
Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus Mujer, Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona 08028, Spain.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 May;44(5):915-922. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.12.004. Epub 2021 Dec 25.
What is the association between the development of pre-eclampsia and endometrial preparation prior to vitrified-warmed embryo transfer (frozen embryo transfer, FET)?
A retrospective cohort study at a tertiary university-based hospital, including a total of 536 pregnant patients who underwent a FET between 2010 and 2019 and delivered in the same institution; 325 patients underwent natural cycle FET (NC-FET) and 211 artificial cycle FET (AC-FET).
Unadjusted, the incidence of pre-eclampsia was significantly higher in AC-FET cycles than in NC-FET cycles (3.7% versus 11.8%, P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that, when adjusting for type of endometrial preparation (artificial cycle versus natural cycle), oocyte recipient cycles and African ethnicity, the risk of developing pre-eclampsia was significantly associated with artificial endometrial preparation or oocyte recipient cycles (AC-FET versus NC-FET: odds ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.4-6.0, P = 0.005).
The current data show a higher incidence of pre-eclampsia in AC-FET versus NC-FET cycles, adding further strength to the existing data on this topic. Together, these recent findings may result in a change in clinical practice, towards a preference for NC-FET cycles over AC-FET cycles in ovulatory patients. Screening for high-risk patients and the development of strategies to mitigate their risk profile could reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia. Further understanding of the different vasoactive substances excreted by the corpus luteum is vital.
在玻璃化冷冻-解冻胚胎移植(冷冻胚胎移植,FET)之前进行子宫内膜准备与先兆子痫的发生之间有何关联?
这是一项在三级大学附属医院进行的回顾性队列研究,共纳入了 536 名在 2010 年至 2019 年间接受 FET 并在同一机构分娩的孕妇患者;其中 325 名患者接受自然周期 FET(NC-FET),211 名患者接受人工周期 FET(AC-FET)。
未校正时,AC-FET 周期中先兆子痫的发生率明显高于 NC-FET 周期(3.7%比 11.8%,P<0.001)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,在调整子宫内膜准备类型(人工周期与自然周期)、卵母细胞受体周期和非洲裔种族后,发生先兆子痫的风险与人工子宫内膜准备或卵母细胞受体周期显著相关(AC-FET 与 NC-FET:优势比 2.9,95%置信区间 1.4-6.0,P=0.005)。
目前的数据显示,AC-FET 周期中先兆子痫的发生率高于 NC-FET 周期,这进一步支持了该主题的现有数据。这些新发现可能会改变临床实践,使有排卵患者倾向于选择 NC-FET 周期而不是 AC-FET 周期。对高危患者进行筛查并制定减轻其风险特征的策略可能会降低先兆子痫的风险。进一步了解黄体分泌的不同血管活性物质至关重要。