Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Department of Microbial Pathogenesis, Boyer Center for Molecular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas Health Science Center, Tyler, Texas, USA.
J Biol Chem. 2022 Apr;298(4):101819. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101819. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
The conformationally dynamic HIV-1 envelope trimer (Env) is the target of broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) that block viral entry. Single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) has revealed that HIV-1 Env exists in at least three conformational states on the virion. Prior to complete host-receptor engagement (State 3), Env resides most prevalently in the smFRET-defined State 1, which is preferentially recognized by most bnAbs that are elicited by natural infection. smFRET has also revealed that soluble trimers containing prefusion-stabilizing disulfide and isoleucine-to-proline substitutions reside primarily in State 2, which is a required intermediate between States 1 and 3. While high-resolution Env structures have been determined for States 2 and 3, the structure of these trimers in State 1 is unknown. To provide insight into the State 1 structure, here we characterized antigenic differences between smFRET-defined states and then correlated these differences with known structural differences between States 2 and 3. We found that cell surface-expressed Env was enriched in each state using state-enriching antibody fragments or small-molecule virus entry inhibitors and then assessed binding to HIV-1 bnAbs preferentially binding different states. We observed small but consistent differences in binding between Env enriched in States 1 and 2, and a more than 10-fold difference in binding to Env enriched in these states versus Env enriched in State 3. We conclude that structural differences between HIV-1 Env States 1 and 3 are likely more than 10-fold greater than those between States 1 and 2, providing important insight into State 1.
构象动态的 HIV-1 包膜三聚体(Env)是广泛中和抗体(bnAbs)的靶标,这些抗体可以阻断病毒进入。单分子Förster 共振能量转移(smFRET)揭示了 HIV-1 Env 在病毒颗粒上至少存在三种构象状态。在完全与宿主受体结合之前(状态 3),Env 主要存在于 smFRET 定义的状态 1 中,大多数由自然感染引发的 bnAbs 优先识别状态 1。smFRET 还揭示了含有融合前稳定二硫键和异亮氨酸到脯氨酸取代的可溶性三聚体主要存在于状态 2 中,状态 2 是状态 1 和状态 3 之间的必需中间体。虽然已经确定了状态 2 和 3 的高分辨率 Env 结构,但状态 1 中这些三聚体的结构尚不清楚。为了深入了解状态 1 的结构,我们在这里描述了 smFRET 定义的状态之间的抗原差异,并将这些差异与状态 2 和 3 之间已知的结构差异进行了关联。我们发现,使用状态富集抗体片段或小分子病毒进入抑制剂,可以在细胞表面表达的 Env 中富集每种状态,然后评估其与优先结合不同状态的 HIV-1 bnAbs 的结合。我们观察到在状态 1 和 2 富集的 Env 之间的结合存在微小但一致的差异,而在这些状态富集的 Env 与在状态 3 富集的 Env 之间的结合存在 10 倍以上的差异。我们得出结论,HIV-1 Env 状态 1 和 3 之间的结构差异可能比状态 1 和 2 之间的结构差异大 10 倍以上,这为状态 1 提供了重要的见解。