Suppr超能文献

病灶内注射纯化蛋白衍生物(PPD)与病灶内注射麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹(MMR)疫苗治疗多发性病毒疣疗效的比较研究

Comparative Study of Efficacy of Intralesional Purified Protein Derivative (PPD) Versus Intralesional Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) Vaccine in Management of Multiple Viral Warts.

作者信息

Bhalala Krishna B, Poojary Shital, Shah Kapisha Sunny

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology, K. J. Somaiya Medical College, Everard Nagar, Sion Chunnabhatti, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2021 Oct-Dec;14(4):397-403. doi: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_166_19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple viral warts represent a frustrating challenge for both patients and physicians. Management is difficult, primarily due to recalcitrance to standard therapy and high recurrence rates. Recently, intralesional antigen immunotherapy has shown promising efficacy in the treatment of warts.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to compare efficacy and safety of intralesional PPD versus measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine in the management of multiple warts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and five patients having multiple warts were randomly divided into group A (PPD), group B (MMR) and group C (normal saline), with 35 patients in each group. In each group, the largest wart was injected intralesionally with 0.1 mL of vaccine at 2 weeks interval until complete clearance or for a maximum of 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Out of 105 patients enrolled in the study, 27, 25, and 21 patients completed the study in group A, group B, and group C, respectively. Rest were lost to follow up due to various reasons such as pain and long treatment duration. Complete clearance was seen in 14 patients (51.85%) in group A, 14 patients (56%) in group B, and 0 patients in group C. Partial clearance was seen in four patients (14.81%) in group A, four patients (16%) in group B, and three (14.28%) patients in group C. Nine patients (33.33%) in group A, seven patients (28%) in group B and 18 (85.71%) patients in group C did not respond to immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Intralesional immunotherapy by both vaccines is a promising, effective, and safe treatment modality with MMR having slight edge.

摘要

背景

多发性病毒疣对患者和医生来说都是一项令人沮丧的挑战。治疗很困难,主要是因为对标准疗法有抗性且复发率高。最近,病灶内抗原免疫疗法在疣的治疗中显示出了有前景的疗效。

目的

我们研究的目的是比较病灶内注射结核菌素纯蛋白衍生物(PPD)与麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹(MMR)疫苗在治疗多发性疣方面的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

105例有多发性疣的患者被随机分为A组(PPD)、B组(MMR)和C组(生理盐水),每组35例。在每组中,每隔2周向最大的疣体病灶内注射0.1 mL疫苗,直至完全清除或最多注射8周。

结果

在参与研究的105例患者中,A组、B组和C组分别有27例、25例和21例患者完成了研究。其余患者由于疼痛和治疗时间长等各种原因失访。A组有14例患者(51.85%)完全清除,B组有14例患者(56%)完全清除,C组无患者完全清除。A组有4例患者(14.81%)部分清除,B组有4例患者(16%)部分清除,C组有3例患者(14.28%)部分清除。A组有9例患者(33.33%)、B组有7例患者(28%)、C组有18例患者(85.71%)对免疫治疗无反应。

结论

两种疫苗的病灶内免疫疗法都是一种有前景、有效且安全的治疗方式,MMR疫苗略具优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab9b/8906278/f50b90d22936/JCAS-14-397-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验