• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

本科生医学教育中的学生参与度:范围综述。

Student engagement in undergraduate medical education: A scoping review.

机构信息

Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2022 Jul;56(7):703-715. doi: 10.1111/medu.14799. Epub 2022 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1111/medu.14799
PMID:35285052
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Student engagement is defined as behavioural, cognitive and emotional aspects of students' academic experience in teaching, learning and research through interacting with other students, faculty and community. Despite the growing interest in the field of student engagement, medical education research in this area is still fragmented. This scoping review aims to contribute to the understanding of measurements, drivers and outcomes of medical student engagement.

METHODS

The authors searched MEDLINE, PubMed, ProQuest, SCOPUS, ERIC, Science Direct and EBESCO for English articles published from 1990 until October 2021. In addition, we hand-searched key medical education journals and references in recently published articles. Using specific selection criteria, two authors independently reviewed the articles for eligibility, followed by data extraction using both quantitative and qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 2136 retrieved articles, 51 studies were selected for the review, and 94% of them were published in the past 8 years. The prevailing measures of student engagement failed to cover the multidimensionality of the construct with more focus on the behavioural dimension. Quantitative methods represented two thirds of the studies with a higher frequency of cross-sectional designs and using self-reports. The identified drivers of medical students' engagement are directed mainly to modifying the context of the learning environment. These factors increased student engagement by fostering relevance of learning, positive student relationships with peers and faculty, and enhancing student agency, and sense of competence. Cognitive engagement appears to be a positive predictor of academic achievement, but the relationship with other dimensions of engagement is controversial.

CONCLUSIONS

Student engagement in undergraduate medical education is an important, yet under-researched construct. The research that does exist suggests engagement to be malleable, something that can be modified by different types of interventions taking into consideration the context of education and practice. Further research is required, however, to address the gaps identified in this review.

摘要

简介

学生参与度被定义为学生在教学、学习和研究中通过与其他学生、教师和社区互动,在学术经历中的行为、认知和情感方面。尽管人们对学生参与度这一领域越来越感兴趣,但医学教育领域的相关研究仍然很零散。本范围综述旨在增进对医学生参与度的衡量标准、驱动因素和结果的理解。

方法

作者在 MEDLINE、PubMed、ProQuest、SCOPUS、ERIC、Science Direct 和 EBESCO 中检索了 1990 年至 2021 年 10 月期间发表的英文文章。此外,我们还手工搜索了最近发表的文章中的重点医学教育期刊和参考文献。使用特定的选择标准,两名作者独立审查文章的合格性,然后使用定量和定性分析进行数据提取。

结果

在检索到的 2136 篇文章中,有 51 篇文章被选入综述,其中 94%的文章发表于过去 8 年。流行的学生参与度衡量标准未能涵盖该结构的多维性,更多地侧重于行为维度。三分之二的研究采用定量方法,且更频繁地使用横断面设计和自我报告。确定的医学生参与度驱动因素主要针对修改学习环境的背景。这些因素通过提高学习的相关性、促进学生与同伴和教师的积极关系以及增强学生的自主性和能力感来增加学生的参与度。认知参与度似乎是学业成绩的一个积极预测因素,但与其他参与度维度的关系存在争议。

结论

本科医学教育中的学生参与度是一个重要但研究不足的结构。现有的研究表明,参与度是可塑的,可以通过不同类型的干预措施来改变,这些干预措施要考虑到教育和实践的背景。然而,需要进一步的研究来解决本综述中发现的差距。

相似文献

1
Student engagement in undergraduate medical education: A scoping review.本科生医学教育中的学生参与度:范围综述。
Med Educ. 2022 Jul;56(7):703-715. doi: 10.1111/medu.14799. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
2
Perceived teacher support and student engagement among higher education students - a systematic literature review.高等教育学生所感知到的教师支持与学生参与度——一项系统的文献综述
BMC Psychol. 2025 Feb 11;13(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02412-w.
3
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
5
Utilizing educational technology in enhancing undergraduate nursing students' engagement and motivation: A scoping review.利用教育技术提高本科护生的参与度和积极性:范围综述。
J Prof Nurs. 2022 Sep-Oct;42:262-275. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.07.015. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
6
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
7
Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.小班教学对提高中小学学生成绩的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 11;14(1):1-107. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.10. eCollection 2018.
8
Learning by making - student-made models and creative projects for medical education: systematic review with qualitative synthesis.通过制作进行学习——用于医学教育的学生制作模型和创意项目:定性综合的系统评价
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 29;25(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06716-8.
9
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
10
The effects of small class sizes on students' academic achievement, socioemotional development and well-being in special education: A systematic review.小班教学对特殊教育中学生学业成绩、社会情感发展和幸福感的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 14;19(3):e1345. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1345. eCollection 2023 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
Unlocking student potential through engagement: exploring the learning outcomes and career intentions of medical students transferring from junior colleges to undergraduate universities in China.通过参与度释放学生潜力:探索中国从专科院校转入本科院校的医学生的学习成果和职业意向。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Aug 8;25(1):1155. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07608-7.
2
Student self-evaluation and satisfaction with the educational experience in pediatric dentistry at Damascus University.大马士革大学牙科专业学生对儿科牙科教育经历的自我评价与满意度
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):869. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07453-8.
3
Putting an Integrated Theoretical Framework of Student Engagement into Practice: A Case Study of Three Student Initiatives at the Technical University of Munich.
将学生参与度的综合理论框架付诸实践:以慕尼黑工业大学的三项学生倡议为例
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Nov 18;35(2):1035-1043. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02223-5. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Barriers to undergraduate medical students' research engagement in Pakistan: a qualitative exploration.巴基斯坦本科医学生参与研究的障碍:一项定性探索
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 23;25(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07185-9.
5
The impact of teacher socio-emotional competence on student engagement: a meta-analysis.教师社会情感能力对学生参与度的影响:一项元分析。
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 7;16:1526371. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1526371. eCollection 2025.
6
Interactive Engagement with Self-Paced Learning Content in a Didactic Course.在讲授课程中与自主学习内容的互动式参与
Healthc Inform Res. 2025 Jan;31(1):96-106. doi: 10.4258/hir.2025.31.1.96. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
7
The effect of flipped learning on students' basic psychological needs and its association with self-esteem.翻转学习对学生基本心理需求的影响及其与自尊的关系。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 11;24(1):1127. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06113-7.
8
Good learning environment of medical schools is an independent predictor for medical students' study engagement.医学院良好的学习环境是医学生学习投入度的一个独立预测因素。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 31;11:1299805. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1299805. eCollection 2024.
9
Qualitative evaluation of a multidisciplinary master of cancer sciences: impacts on graduates and influencing curricular factors.多学科癌症科学硕士课程的定性评估:对毕业生的影响和影响课程的因素。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 8;24(1):734. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05744-0.
10
Measuring sociocultural engagement of health professions education students: a psychometric study.测量健康职业教育学生的社会文化参与度:一项心理测量学研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 23;24(1):567. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05566-0.