Ertem Ozge, Tufekci Ozlem, Oren Hale, Tuncok Yesim, Ergon Mahmut Cem, Gumustekin Mukaddes
Medical Pharmacology, University of Health Sciences Izmir Bozyaka Education and Research Hospital, Karabaglar/Izmir, Turkey.
Division of Pediatric Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, Balcova/Izmir, Turkey.
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2023 Jun;29(4):861-873. doi: 10.1177/10781552221086887. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
Despite therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetic-guided dose selection are recommended for pediatric patients, safety of voriconazole is mostly monitored by clinical assessment. Having comprehensive knowledge of safety profile and distinguishing incidental events from the reactions that are truly related to voriconazole use are crucial for safer and uninterrupted treatment.
This study aimed to address adverse reactions during the first month of voriconazole use by systematically evaluating retrospective records of all adverse events. Patients/Methods: It is a single-center, retrospective analysis of patients who received voriconazole from 1 September 2010 to 1 September 2020. Severity of abnormal findings in medical records were systematically graded. Causality between voriconazole and the events was evaluated by Liverpool Causality Assessment Tool (LCAT), Naranjo Algorithm and World Health Organization Causality Assessment System. The events with possible or probable causal relation to voriconazole are classified as adverse reaction.
Records of 45 patients included in the study. The overall frequency of adverse reactions was 51.1%. Hepatobiliary laboratory adverse reactions identified in 48.9% of the patients and led to treatment discontinuation in 20.0%. Amylase and lipase elevation (2.2%), ventricular extra systoles (2.2%), hallucination and nightmares (2.2%) were other adverse reactions.
Hepatobiliary abnormalities were the most common adverse reactions and the most common cause of treatment discontinuation. For safer treatment in critically ill patients, the dose should be personalized. To clearly identify the accurate frequency and the causality of all adverse reactions, prospective studies with much larger sample size are needed.
尽管建议对儿科患者进行治疗药物监测和基于药物遗传学的剂量选择,但伏立康唑的安全性大多通过临床评估来监测。全面了解安全性概况并区分偶然事件与真正与伏立康唑使用相关的反应对于更安全、不间断的治疗至关重要。
本研究旨在通过系统评估所有不良事件的回顾性记录,探讨伏立康唑使用第一个月期间的不良反应。患者/方法:这是一项对2010年9月1日至2020年9月1日接受伏立康唑治疗的患者进行的单中心回顾性分析。对病历中的异常发现严重程度进行系统分级。通过利物浦因果关系评估工具(LCAT)、纳伦霍算法和世界卫生组织因果关系评估系统评估伏立康唑与事件之间的因果关系。与伏立康唑可能或很可能存在因果关系的事件被归类为不良反应。
本研究纳入了45例患者的记录。不良反应的总体发生率为51.1%。48.9%的患者出现肝胆实验室不良反应,20.0%的患者因此停药。淀粉酶和脂肪酶升高(2.2%)、室性早搏(2.2%)、幻觉和噩梦(2.2%)是其他不良反应。
肝胆异常是最常见的不良反应,也是停药的最常见原因。为了在重症患者中更安全地治疗,剂量应个体化。为了明确所有不良反应的准确发生率和因果关系,需要进行更大样本量的前瞻性研究。