Suppr超能文献

成为(蜜蜂)传粉者:马萨诸塞州的养蜂业和环保意识。

Be(e)coming pollinators: Beekeeping and perceptions of environmentalism in Massachusetts.

机构信息

Sociology Department, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Mar 14;17(3):e0263281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263281. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

In an era of mass extinction and biodiversity crisis, it is increasingly crucial to cultivate more just and inclusive multispecies futures. As mitigation and adaption efforts are formed in response to these crises, just transitions forward require intentional consideration of the hybrid entanglement of humans, human societies, and wider landscapes. We thus apply a critical hybridity framework to examine the entanglement of the pollinator crisis with the cultural and agricultural practice of hobbyist beekeeping. We draw on ethnographic engagements with Massachusetts beekeepers and find apiculture to be widely understood as a form of environmentalism-including as both a mitigation to and adaptation for the pollinator crisis. Illustrating how power-laden socioecological negotiations shape and reshape regional environments, we then discuss how this narrative relies on the capitalistic and instrumental logics characteristic of Capitalocene environmentalisms. These rationalities, which obscure the hybridity of landscapes, consequently increase the likelihood of problematic unintended consequences. Also present, however, is a deeper engagement with hybrid perspectives, with some beekeepers even offering pathways toward inclusive solutions. We conclude that if more just and biodiverse futures are to be realized, beekeeping communities must foster increasingly hybrid visions of apiculture as situated within socioecological and contested landscapes.

摘要

在大灭绝和生物多样性危机的时代,培养更加公正和包容的多物种未来变得愈发重要。随着针对这些危机的缓解和适应措施的形成,公正的转型需要有意考虑人类、人类社会和更广泛的景观的混合纠缠。因此,我们应用批判性的混合性框架来研究传粉媒介危机与业余养蜂的文化和农业实践的混合纠缠。我们借鉴了与马萨诸塞州养蜂人的民族志参与,并发现养蜂业被广泛理解为一种环境保护主义形式,包括作为传粉媒介危机的缓解和适应措施。通过说明权力充斥的社会生态谈判如何塑造和重塑区域环境,我们接着讨论了这种叙述如何依赖于资本新纪元环境主义的资本主义和工具逻辑特征。这些理性主义掩盖了景观的混合性,因此增加了出现有问题的意外后果的可能性。然而,也存在着对混合观点的更深层次的参与,一些养蜂人甚至提供了包容性解决方案的途径。我们得出结论,如果要实现更加公正和多样化的未来,养蜂社区必须在社会生态和有争议的景观中培养越来越混合的养蜂愿景。

相似文献

4
Introduction to Apiculture (Apis mellifera).养蜂学概论(Apis mellifera)。
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2021 Nov;37(3):381-386. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2021.06.013.
10
Can Solar Energy Fuel Pollinator Conservation?太阳能能否为传粉者保护提供动力?
Environ Entomol. 2021 Aug 12;50(4):757-761. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvab041.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Confronting the Modern Gordian Knot of Urban Beekeeping.直面都市养蜂的现代戈尔迪之结。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2020 Nov;35(11):956-959. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
4
Human dimensions of insect pollinator conservation.昆虫传粉媒介保护的人文维度。
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2020 Apr;38:107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2020.04.001. Epub 2020 Apr 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验