Sociology Department, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 14;17(3):e0263281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263281. eCollection 2022.
In an era of mass extinction and biodiversity crisis, it is increasingly crucial to cultivate more just and inclusive multispecies futures. As mitigation and adaption efforts are formed in response to these crises, just transitions forward require intentional consideration of the hybrid entanglement of humans, human societies, and wider landscapes. We thus apply a critical hybridity framework to examine the entanglement of the pollinator crisis with the cultural and agricultural practice of hobbyist beekeeping. We draw on ethnographic engagements with Massachusetts beekeepers and find apiculture to be widely understood as a form of environmentalism-including as both a mitigation to and adaptation for the pollinator crisis. Illustrating how power-laden socioecological negotiations shape and reshape regional environments, we then discuss how this narrative relies on the capitalistic and instrumental logics characteristic of Capitalocene environmentalisms. These rationalities, which obscure the hybridity of landscapes, consequently increase the likelihood of problematic unintended consequences. Also present, however, is a deeper engagement with hybrid perspectives, with some beekeepers even offering pathways toward inclusive solutions. We conclude that if more just and biodiverse futures are to be realized, beekeeping communities must foster increasingly hybrid visions of apiculture as situated within socioecological and contested landscapes.
在大灭绝和生物多样性危机的时代,培养更加公正和包容的多物种未来变得愈发重要。随着针对这些危机的缓解和适应措施的形成,公正的转型需要有意考虑人类、人类社会和更广泛的景观的混合纠缠。因此,我们应用批判性的混合性框架来研究传粉媒介危机与业余养蜂的文化和农业实践的混合纠缠。我们借鉴了与马萨诸塞州养蜂人的民族志参与,并发现养蜂业被广泛理解为一种环境保护主义形式,包括作为传粉媒介危机的缓解和适应措施。通过说明权力充斥的社会生态谈判如何塑造和重塑区域环境,我们接着讨论了这种叙述如何依赖于资本新纪元环境主义的资本主义和工具逻辑特征。这些理性主义掩盖了景观的混合性,因此增加了出现有问题的意外后果的可能性。然而,也存在着对混合观点的更深层次的参与,一些养蜂人甚至提供了包容性解决方案的途径。我们得出结论,如果要实现更加公正和多样化的未来,养蜂社区必须在社会生态和有争议的景观中培养越来越混合的养蜂愿景。