Mercier Frederic, Passot Guillaume, Bonnot Pierre-Emmanuel, Cashin Peter, Ceelen Wim, Decullier Evelyne, Villeneuve Laurent, Walter Thomas, Levine Edward A, Glehen Olivier
Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Montreal, University of Montreal, 1000 St-Denis, Montreal, QC, H2X 0C1, Canada.
The Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices civils de Lyon, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.
World J Surg. 2022 Jun;46(6):1336-1343. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06498-w. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
Peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal goblet cell carcinoma (A-GCC) is a rare and aggressive form of appendiceal tumor. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intra peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was reported as an interesting alternative regarding survival compared to surgery without HIPEC and/or systemic chemotherapy. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of CRS and HIPEC for patients presenting A-GCC through an international registry.
A prospective multicenter international database was retrospectively searched to identify all patients with A-GCC tumor and peritoneal metastases who underwent CRS and HIPEC through the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI). The post-operative complications, long-term results, and principal prognostic factors were analyzed.
The analysis included 83 patients. After a median follow-up of 47 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 34.6 months. The 3- and 5-year OS was 48.5% and 35.7%, respectively. Patients who underwent complete macroscopic CRS had a significantly better survival than those treated with incomplete CRS. The 5-year OS was 44% and 0% for patients who underwent complete, and incomplete CRS, respectively (HR 9.65, p < 0.001). Lymph node involvement and preoperative chemotherapy were also predictive of a worse prognosis. There were 3 postoperative deaths, and 30% of the patients had major complications.
CRS and HIPEC may increase long-term survival in selected patients with peritoneal metastases of A-GCC origin, especially when complete CRS is achieved. Ideally, randomized control trials or more retrospective data are needed to confirm CRS and HIPEC as the gold standard in this pathology.
阑尾杯状细胞癌(A-GCC)所致的腹膜癌病是一种罕见且侵袭性强的阑尾肿瘤形式。与未进行热灌注化疗(HIPEC)和/或全身化疗的手术相比,细胞减灭术(CRS)联合热灌注化疗被报道为一种在生存方面有意义的替代方案。我们的目的是通过一个国际登记处评估CRS和HIPEC对患有A-GCC的患者的影响。
对一个前瞻性多中心国际数据库进行回顾性检索,以识别所有通过国际腹膜表面肿瘤学组(PSOGI)接受CRS和HIPEC的A-GCC肿瘤及腹膜转移患者。分析术后并发症、长期结果和主要预后因素。
分析纳入83例患者。中位随访47个月后,中位总生存期(OS)为34.6个月。3年和5年总生存率分别为48.5%和35.7%。接受肉眼下完全CRS的患者生存明显优于接受不完全CRS的患者。接受完全和不完全CRS的患者5年总生存率分别为44%和0%(风险比9.65,p<0.001)。淋巴结受累和术前化疗也提示预后较差。术后有3例死亡,30%的患者出现严重并发症。
CRS和HIPEC可能会提高部分A-GCC来源腹膜转移患者的长期生存率,尤其是在实现完全CRS的情况下。理想情况下,需要随机对照试验或更多回顾性数据来确认CRS和HIPEC作为这种病理类型的金标准。