• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Understanding topical fluoride hesitancy and refusal behaviors through the extended parallel process model and health belief model.通过扩展平行过程模型和健康信念模型理解局部用氟化物的犹豫和拒绝行为。
J Public Health Dent. 2023 Mar;83(1):3-8. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12512. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
2
Fluoride hesitancy: A mixed methods study on decision-making about forms of fluoride.氟化物犹豫:关于氟化物形式决策的混合方法研究。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2023 Oct;51(5):997-1008. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12800. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
3
Parent Refusal of Topical Fluoride for Their Children: Clinical Strategies and Future Research Priorities to Improve Evidence-Based Pediatric Dental Practice.家长拒绝为其子女使用局部用氟化物:改善循证儿科牙科实践的临床策略及未来研究重点
Dent Clin North Am. 2017 Jul;61(3):607-617. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 May 4.
4
A conceptual model on caregivers' hesitancy of topical fluoride for their children.关于照顾者对儿童局部用氟化物的犹豫的概念模型。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 22;18(3):e0282834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282834. eCollection 2023.
5
A Mixed-Methods Study on Topical Fluoride Beliefs and Refusal Behaviors for Caregivers of Children with Special Health Care Needs.一项针对有特殊医疗需求儿童照顾者的局部用氟化物信念和拒绝行为的混合方法研究。
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Jan;28(1):104-115. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03806-1. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
6
Topical fluoride to prevent early childhood caries: Systematic review with network meta-analysis.局部用氟化物预防幼儿龋病:系统评价与网络荟萃分析。
J Dent. 2022 Jan;116:103885. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103885. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
7
Cochrane reviews of randomized trials of fluoride therapies for preventing dental caries.关于氟化物疗法预防龋齿的随机试验的Cochrane系统评价。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2009 Sep;10(3):183-91. doi: 10.1007/BF03262681.
8
Topical fluoride hesitancy among caregivers: Development of a content-valid topical fluoride hesitancy identification item pool.照顾者对局部用氟化物的犹豫:局部用氟化物犹豫识别项目库的内容效度发展。
J Public Health Dent. 2023 Mar;83(1):116-122. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12558. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
9
ADA clinical recommendations on topical fluoride for caries prevention.美国牙科协会关于局部用氟预防龋齿的临床建议。
Evid Based Dent. 2014 Jun;15(2):38-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401019.
10
Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.窝沟封闭剂与氟化物漆预防儿童和青少年恒牙龋齿的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 18;2016(1):CD003067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003067.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Topical fluoride hesitancy and opposition are significantly and positively associated: A cross-sectional study.局部用氟的迟疑态度与反对态度呈显著正相关:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 30;20(4):e0322027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322027. eCollection 2025.
2
Investigating the efficacy of a varnish containing gallic acid on remineralization of enamel lesions: an in vitro study.研究含没食子酸的清漆对牙釉质脱矿再矿化疗效的体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 3;24(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03921-7.
3
Psychometric properties of the Fluoride Hesitancy Identification Tool (FHIT).氟化物犹豫识别工具(FHIT)的心理测量学特性。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 17;19(1):e0297188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297188. eCollection 2024.
4
A Qualitative Assessment of Factors Influencing Fluoride-Hesitant Parents' Trust of Dentists.氟化物犹豫型家长对牙医信任影响因素的定性评估。
Pediatr Dent. 2023 Mar 15;45(2):133-141.
5
Topical fluoride hesitancy among caregivers: Development of a content-valid topical fluoride hesitancy identification item pool.照顾者对局部用氟化物的犹豫:局部用氟化物犹豫识别项目库的内容效度发展。
J Public Health Dent. 2023 Mar;83(1):116-122. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12558. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
6
Association between caregiver opposition to topical fluoride and COVID-19 vaccines.看护者反对局部用氟化物与 COVID-19 疫苗之间的关联。
Vaccine. 2023 Jan 27;41(5):1035-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.018. Epub 2022 Dec 14.

通过扩展平行过程模型和健康信念模型理解局部用氟化物的犹豫和拒绝行为。

Understanding topical fluoride hesitancy and refusal behaviors through the extended parallel process model and health belief model.

机构信息

Department of Oral Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Department of Community and Behavioral Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

出版信息

J Public Health Dent. 2023 Mar;83(1):3-8. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12512. Epub 2022 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1111/jphd.12512
PMID:35288941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9470784/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Topical fluoride helps prevent dental caries. However, many caregivers are hesitant about topical fluoride for their children and may refuse it during clinic visits. In this qualitative study, we assessed the relevance of the extended parallel process model (EPPM) and health belief model (HBM) in caregivers' decision-making about topical fluoride.

METHODS

We interviewed 56 fluoride-hesitant or fluoride-refusing caregivers using a semi-structured interview script that included questions based on select constructs from the EPPM (perceived severity, susceptibility, response efficacy) and HBM (perceived benefits and consequences). Two team members conducted a thematic analysis of the interview data.

RESULTS

Most caregivers acknowledged the severity of cavities but did not believe their child was susceptible. Caregivers also understood the general benefits of fluoride in preventing tooth decay, but reported low response efficacy of fluoride for their children especially compared to the other ways of reducing caries risk like reducing sugar intake and toothbrushing. Many caregivers had concerns about topical fluoride, especially regarding safety, with the potential consequences of fluoride outweighing its benefits.

CONCLUSION

Our findings were generally consistent with the EPPM and HBM, which appear to be relevant in understanding fluoride hesitancy behaviors. Additional research is needed on ways to improve provider communications about topical fluoride with caregivers.

摘要

目的

局部用氟化物有助于预防龋齿。然而,许多看护者对儿童局部用氟化物持犹豫态度,在就诊时可能会拒绝使用。在这项定性研究中,我们评估了扩展平行过程模型(EPPM)和健康信念模型(HBM)在看护者局部用氟化物决策中的相关性。

方法

我们使用半结构化访谈脚本采访了 56 名局部用氟化物犹豫或拒绝的看护者,访谈脚本包括基于 EPPM(感知严重性、易感性、反应效果)和 HBM(感知益处和后果)的选定结构的问题。两名团队成员对访谈数据进行了主题分析。

结果

大多数看护者承认龋齿的严重性,但不认为他们的孩子易受影响。看护者也了解氟化物在预防龋齿方面的一般益处,但报告说氟化物对他们孩子的反应效果较低,尤其是与减少龋齿风险的其他方法(如减少糖摄入量和刷牙)相比。许多看护者对局部用氟化物有顾虑,特别是对安全性的担忧,氟化物的潜在后果超过了其益处。

结论

我们的发现与 EPPM 和 HBM 基本一致,这些模型似乎与理解局部用氟化物犹豫行为有关。需要进一步研究如何改善提供者与看护者之间关于局部用氟化物的沟通方式。