Suppr超能文献

经骶棘韧带固定后阴部神经卡压的手术治疗。

Surgical management of pudendal nerve entrapment after sacrospinous ligament fixation.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Bergman Clinics - Vrouw, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BJOG. 2022 Oct;129(11):1908-1915. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17145. Epub 2022 Mar 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the efficacy of sacrospinous ligament (SSL) suture removal on the reduction of pain symptoms in the case of suspected pudendal nerve entrapment after sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral centre, the Netherlands.

POPULATION

A cohort of 21 women having their SSLF sutures removed because of SSLF-related pain symptoms.

METHODS

Clinical record review.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was reduction of pain after SSL suture removal. Secondary outcome measures were time interval between suture placement and suture removal, complete suture removal, adverse events and recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

RESULTS

A total of 21 women underwent SSL suture removal for severe and/or persistent pain, which was confirmed on clinical examination: 95% of the women (20/21) reported pain reduction after suture removal, and 57% reported complete pain relief. The time interval between suture placement and suture removal was at a median of 414 days (range 8-1855 days). Sutures could be completely removed in 86% of cases (18/21). One woman had excessive blood loss (520 ml) without blood transfusion. At 6-8 weeks after surgery, 10% of the women (2/21) had renewed symptomatic POP, stage ≥ 2, for which additional POP surgery was indicated.

CONCLUSIONS

When performed by an experienced clinician, SSL suture removal is feasible and efficacious, with low morbidity. In addition, the risk of recurrent POP in the short term appeared to be low.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

The surgical removal of sacrospinous ligament sutures is safe and efficacious for pain relief, even remote from initial placement.

摘要

目的

分析在疑似阴部神经卡压的情况下,行骶骨棘突固定(SSL)缝线取出术对减轻骶骨棘突固定后(SSLF)相关疼痛症状的疗效。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

荷兰三级转诊中心。

人群

21 名因 SSLF 相关疼痛症状而取出 SSL 缝线的女性患者。

方法

临床病历回顾。

主要观察指标

缝线取出后疼痛缓解情况为主要结局。次要观察指标包括缝线放置与取出之间的时间间隔、完全去除缝线、不良事件和盆腔器官脱垂(POP)复发。

结果

共有 21 名女性因严重和/或持续性疼痛而行 SSL 缝线取出术,经临床检查证实疼痛:95%(20/21)的女性报告缝线取出后疼痛减轻,57%报告完全缓解疼痛。缝线放置与取出之间的时间间隔中位数为 414 天(范围 8-1855 天)。86%(18/21)的病例可完全去除缝线。1 例患者失血过多(520ml),未输血。术后 6-8 周,10%(2/21)的女性出现症状性 POP 复发,≥2 期,需要进一步进行 POP 手术。

结论

由经验丰富的临床医生进行操作时,SSL 缝线取出术是可行且有效的,且发病率低。此外,短期内复发 POP 的风险似乎较低。

推文摘要

对于疼痛缓解,即使在最初放置缝线很久之后,经阴道行骶棘韧带缝线取出术也是安全有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2927/9545288/dcc03cddd44d/BJO-129-1908-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验