Aslani Hossein, Pasha Zanoosi Mohamad Reza, Navali Amir Mohamad
Department of Orthopedics, Shohada hospital, Tabriz University of Medical sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022 Jan;10(1):38-44. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2021.47573.2334.
This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the leukocyte esterase (LE) band in two groups of patients receiving and not receiving antibiotics and compare the results.
This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 105 joints with clinical suspicion of infectious arthritis (based on Kocher criteria) admitted in Shohada Hospital, Tabriz, Iran, within 2017-2018. Patients were divided into two groups, including receiving antibiotics (n=29; group 1) and not receiving antibiotics (n=76; group 2). Articular fluid aspiration was performed under sterile conditions with an 18-gauge angiocath with at least 1 ml volume of the hip, knee, ankle, elbow, and shoulder joints. Polymorphonuclear cell percentage count, cell count, Gram staining (GS), culture, and leukocyte esterase test were performed immediately after the aspiration of the specimens.
Levels of synovial fluid white blood cell count, serum white blood cell count, PMN, serum glucose, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and time of aspiration (TOA) were significantly higher in the group receiving antibiotics (P<0.05). Synovial glucose levels were significantly lower in the group receiving antibiotics. Furthermore, the positive frequency of glucose esterase, blood culture, GS, serum culture, and ultimate diagnosis of septic arthritis tests were significantly lower in the antibiotic receiving group (P<0.05). The sensitivity, and positive predictive value of the leukocyte esterase test were obtained at 100%, and 96.55% in the antibiotic receiving group, respectively. Moreover, in the group not receiving antibiotics, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the leukocyte esterase test were estimated at 72.22%, 92.50%, 89.66%, 78.72%, respectively.
Antibiotic use and the prolongation of TOA lead to increased inflammatory products, which is interfering with lab variables. As a result, they increase the sensitivity of the test. The sensitivity and specificity of the leukocyte esterase test in patients who did not receive antibiotics showed that this was a suitable and reliable laboratory method for the rapid detection of infectious arthritis that required an emergency rescue procedure.
本研究旨在评估两组接受和未接受抗生素治疗的患者中白细胞酯酶(LE)条带的敏感性和特异性,并比较结果。
本前瞻性横断面研究于2017 - 2018年在伊朗大不里士的Shohada医院对105个临床怀疑感染性关节炎(基于Kocher标准)的关节进行。患者分为两组,包括接受抗生素治疗的患者(n = 29;第1组)和未接受抗生素治疗的患者(n = 76;第2组)。在无菌条件下,使用18号血管穿刺针进行关节液抽吸,抽吸至少1 ml来自髋、膝、踝、肘和肩关节的关节液。标本抽吸后立即进行多形核细胞百分比计数、细胞计数、革兰氏染色(GS)、培养和白细胞酯酶检测。
接受抗生素治疗的组中,滑液白细胞计数、血清白细胞计数、中性粒细胞、血清葡萄糖、红细胞沉降率、C反应蛋白水平以及抽吸时间(TOA)均显著更高(P < 0.05)。接受抗生素治疗的组中滑液葡萄糖水平显著更低。此外,接受抗生素治疗的组中葡萄糖酯酶、血培养、GS、血清培养以及脓毒性关节炎最终诊断检测的阳性频率显著更低(P < 0.05)。接受抗生素治疗的组中白细胞酯酶检测的敏感性和阳性预测值分别为100%和96.55%。此外,在未接受抗生素治疗的组中,白细胞酯酶检测的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别估计为72.22%、92.50%、89.66%、78.72%。
使用抗生素和延长TOA会导致炎症产物增加,这会干扰实验室变量。因此,它们增加了检测的敏感性。未接受抗生素治疗的患者中白细胞酯酶检测的敏感性和特异性表明,这是一种适用于快速检测需要紧急抢救程序的感染性关节炎的可靠实验室方法。