Departments of Pediatrics, Penn State Hershey Pediatric Cardiovascular Research Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Surgery, Penn State Hershey Pediatric Cardiovascular Research Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Penn State Hershey Pediatric Cardiovascular Research Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Departments of Pediatrics, Penn State Hershey Pediatric Cardiovascular Research Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Surgery, Penn State Hershey Pediatric Cardiovascular Research Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Oct;114(4):1404-1411. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.02.053. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
The objective of this randomized clinical trial was to investigate the effects of perfusion modalities on cerebral hemodynamics, vital organ injury, quantified by the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 (PELOD-2) Score, and clinical outcomes in risk-stratified congenital cardiac surgery patients.
This randomized clinical trial included 159 consecutive congenital cardiac surgery patients in whom pulsatile (n = 83) or nonpulsatile (n = 76) perfusion was used. Cerebral hemodynamics were assessed using transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Multiple organ injury was quantified using the PELOD-2 score at 24, 48, and 72 hours. Clinical outcomes, including intubation time, intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and mortality, were also evaluated.
The Pulsatility Index at the middle cerebral artery and in the arterial line during aortic cross-clamping was consistently better maintained in the pulsatile group. Demographics and cardiopulmonary bypass characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. While risk stratification with The Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (STAT) Mortality Categories was similar between the groups, Mortality Categories 1 to 3 demonstrated more patients than Mortality Categories 4 and 5. There were no differences in clinical outcomes between the groups. The PELOD-2 scores showed a progressive improvement from 24 hours to 72 hours, but the results were not statistically different between the groups.
The Pulsatillity Index for the pulsatile group demonstrated a more physiologic pattern compared with the nonpulsatile group. While pulsatile perfusion did not increase plasma-free hemoglobin levels or microemboli delivery, it also did not demonstrate any improvements in clinical outcomes or PELOD-2 scores, suggesting that while pulsatile perfusion is a safe method, it not a "magic bullet" for congenital cardiac operations.
本随机临床试验旨在研究灌注方式对脑血流动力学、通过小儿 LOGISTIC 器官功能障碍评分(PELOD-2)量化的重要器官损伤以及风险分层先天性心脏手术患者的临床结局的影响。
本随机临床试验纳入了 159 例连续的先天性心脏手术患者,其中 83 例采用搏动性灌注,76 例采用非搏动性灌注。使用经颅多普勒超声评估脑血流动力学。在 24、48 和 72 小时使用 PELOD-2 评分量化多器官损伤。还评估了临床结局,包括插管时间、重症监护病房住院时间(LOS)、住院 LOS 和死亡率。
在主动脉阻断期间,大脑中动脉和动脉线上的搏动指数在搏动组中得到了更好的维持。两组的人口统计学和体外循环特征相似。尽管两组的胸外科医师协会-欧洲心血管外科学会(STAT)死亡率分类风险分层相似,但死亡率分类 1 至 3 比死亡率分类 4 和 5 显示出更多的患者。两组之间的临床结局没有差异。PELOD-2 评分从 24 小时到 72 小时呈逐渐改善趋势,但两组之间的结果没有统计学差异。
与非搏动组相比,搏动组的搏动指数表现出更符合生理的模式。虽然搏动性灌注没有增加血浆游离血红蛋白水平或微栓子的输送,但也没有在临床结局或 PELOD-2 评分方面显示出任何改善,表明虽然搏动性灌注是一种安全的方法,但它不是先天性心脏手术的“万能药”。