• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性和医疗保健专业人员对乳腺癌筛查决策辅助工具的期望是什么?法国的一项定性研究。

What do women and healthcare professionals expect of decision aids for breast cancer screening? A qualitative study in France.

机构信息

Universite Paris Cité, Département de Médecine Générale, F-75006, Paris, France

Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Département Universitaire de Médecine Générale, DUMG, F-93430, Villetaneuse, France.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 15;12(3):e058879. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058879.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058879
PMID:35292502
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8928302/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Breast cancer screening decision aids (DAs) are designed to help women decide whether or not to participate in mammography-based programmes. We aimed to explore women's and healthcare professionals' expectations of a breast cancer screening DA, as part of the French DEDICACES study.

METHODS

This French qualitative study was based on semistructured, individual interviews with women from the general population, general practitioners (GPs), midwives, gynaecologists, radiologists and screening centre managers. Sampling was purposive and used diversification criteria. The inductive analysis was based on grounded theory.

RESULTS

Between April 2018 and May 2019, we interviewed 40 people: 13 women, 14 GPs, 4 gynaecologists, 3 midwives, 3 radiologists and 3 screening centre managers. The women and the healthcare professionals considered that a DA could help to improve levels of knowledge, harmonise medical practice and provide reliable, comprehensive information. Overall, the interviewees wanted an easy-to-use, intuitive, graphic-rich, interactive, computer-based, patient-centred DA. Use of the DA might be limited by a lack of familiarity with shared decision-making (SDM), the risk of misuse and a preference for asymmetric positive information.

CONCLUSION

The present results are likely to facilitate the development of the first validated tool for SDM support in French breast cancer screening programmes.

摘要

目的

乳腺癌筛查决策辅助工具(DA)旨在帮助女性决定是否参与基于乳房 X 光摄影的项目。我们旨在探索女性和医疗保健专业人员对乳腺癌筛查 DA 的期望,这是法国 DEDICACES 研究的一部分。

方法

这项法国定性研究基于对普通人群中的女性、全科医生(GP)、助产士、妇科医生、放射科医生和筛查中心经理的半结构化个体访谈。抽样是有目的的,并使用多样化标准。归纳分析基于扎根理论。

结果

2018 年 4 月至 2019 年 5 月,我们采访了 40 人:13 名女性、14 名全科医生、4 名妇科医生、3 名助产士、3 名放射科医生和 3 名筛查中心经理。女性和医疗保健专业人员认为,DA 可以帮助提高知识水平、协调医疗实践并提供可靠、全面的信息。总体而言,受访者希望使用易于使用、直观、图形丰富、互动、基于计算机、以患者为中心的 DA。DA 的使用可能会受到对共享决策(SDM)缺乏熟悉程度、误用风险和对不对称正信息的偏好的限制。

结论

目前的结果可能有助于为法国乳腺癌筛查项目中的 SDM 支持开发第一个经过验证的工具。

相似文献

1
What do women and healthcare professionals expect of decision aids for breast cancer screening? A qualitative study in France.女性和医疗保健专业人员对乳腺癌筛查决策辅助工具的期望是什么?法国的一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 15;12(3):e058879. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058879.
2
Development and evaluation of a decision aid for women eligible for organized breast cancer screening according to international standards: A multi-method study.根据国际标准,为有资格接受组织性乳腺癌筛查的女性开发和评估决策辅助工具:一项多方法研究。
Breast. 2024 Feb;73:103613. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.103613. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
3
Web-based decision aids to support breast cancer screening decisions: systematic review and meta-analysis.基于网络的决策辅助工具以支持乳腺癌筛查决策:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Comp Eff Res. 2020 Oct;9(14):985-1002. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0052. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
4
Would shared decision-making be useful in breast cancer screening programmes? A qualitative study using focus group discussions to gather evidence from French women with different socioeconomic backgrounds.在乳腺癌筛查项目中,共同决策是否有用?一项使用焦点小组讨论从具有不同社会经济背景的法国女性中收集证据的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;24(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17876-5.
5
[Organized or individual breast cancer screening: what motivates women?].[组织性或个体性乳腺癌筛查:是什么促使女性这么做?]
Sante Publique. 2015 Mar-Apr;27(2):213-20.
6
Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.乳腺 X 线摄影共享决策的关键要素:文献的范围综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1805-1814. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4576-6. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
7
Perceptions of Racially and Ethnically Diverse Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer Regarding the Use of a Web-Based Decision Aid for Chemoprevention: Qualitative Study Nested Within a Randomized Controlled Trial.高乳腺癌风险的不同种族和民族的女性对使用基于网络的化学预防决策辅助工具的看法:随机对照试验中嵌套的定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 8;23(6):e23839. doi: 10.2196/23839.
8
Preconceptions influence women's perceptions of information on breast cancer screening: a qualitative study.先入之见影响女性对乳腺癌筛查信息的认知:一项定性研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Sep 3;8:404. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1327-1.
9
Development and evaluation of a decision aid on mammography screening for women 75 years and older.发展和评估针对 75 岁及以上女性的乳房 X 光筛查决策辅助工具。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Mar;174(3):417-24. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13639.
10
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员采用共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Would shared decision-making be useful in breast cancer screening programmes? A qualitative study using focus group discussions to gather evidence from French women with different socioeconomic backgrounds.在乳腺癌筛查项目中,共同决策是否有用?一项使用焦点小组讨论从具有不同社会经济背景的法国女性中收集证据的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;24(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17876-5.
2
Mixed-Method Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Shared Decision-Making Tools for Cancer Screening.癌症筛查共同决策工具的混合方法系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 29;15(15):3867. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153867.
3
A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of Knowledge About Breast Cancer and Perceived Barriers to the Uptake of Mammogram Screening Among Northern Saudi Women: A Population-Based Study.沙特阿拉伯北部女性对乳腺癌的认知及乳腺钼靶筛查接受度相关感知障碍的横断面评估:一项基于人群的研究
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2023 Jul 10;15:451-460. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S414635. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
2
Quality of decision aids developed for women at average risk of breast cancer eligible for mammographic screening: Systematic review and assessment according to the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument.用于有接受乳房 X 光筛查资格的平均乳腺癌风险女性的决策辅助工具的质量:根据国际患者决策辅助工具标准工具进行的系统评价和评估。
Cancer. 2020 Jun 15;126(12):2765-2774. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32858. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
3
Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in women aged 40-74 years who are not at increased risk for breast cancer.针对乳腺癌风险未增加的40至74岁女性乳腺癌筛查的建议。
CMAJ. 2018 Dec 10;190(49):E1441-E1451. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.180463.
4
Breast Cancer Screening in 2018: Time for Shared Decision Making.2018年乳腺癌筛查:是时候进行共同决策了。
JAMA. 2018 May 1;319(17):1814-1815. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3388.
5
Assessment of the effects of decision aids about breast cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.乳腺癌筛查决策辅助工具效果评估:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 6;7(10):e016894. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016894.
6
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
7
A qualitative study on a decision aid for breast cancer screening: Views from women and health professionals.一项关于乳腺癌筛查决策辅助工具的定性研究:女性和健康专业人员的观点
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 May;26(3). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12660. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
8
Decision aid on breast cancer screening reduces attendance rate: results of a large-scale, randomized, controlled study by the DECIDEO group.乳腺癌筛查决策辅助工具降低了参与率:DECIDEO 小组的一项大规模随机对照研究结果
Oncotarget. 2016 Mar 15;7(11):12885-92. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7332.
9
Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.乳腺癌筛查的获益与危害:系统评价。
JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1615-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13183.
10
Use of a decision aid including information on overdetection to support informed choice about breast cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial.使用包含过度检测信息的决策辅助工具来支持有关乳腺癌筛查的知情选择:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Apr 25;385(9978):1642-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60123-4. Epub 2015 Feb 18.