Toledo-Chávarri A, Rué M, Codern-Bové N, Carles-Lavila M, Perestelo-Pérez L, Pérez-Lacasta M J, Feijoo-Cid M
Canary Islands Foundation of Health Research (FUNCANIS), Tenerife, Spain.
Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 May;26(3). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12660. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
This qualitative study evaluates a decision aid that includes the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening and analyses women's perception of the information received and healthcare professionals' perceptions of the convenience of providing it. Seven focus groups of women aged 40-69 years (n = 39) and two groups of healthcare professionals (n = 23) were conducted in Catalonia and the Canary Islands. The focus groups consisted of guided discussions regarding decision-making about breast cancer screening, and acceptability and feasibility of the decision aid. A content analysis was performed. Women positively value receiving information regarding the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening. Several women had difficulties understanding some concepts, especially those regarding overdiagnosis. Women preferred to share the decisions on screening with healthcare professionals. The professionals noted the lack of inclusion of some harms and benefits in the decision aid, and proposed improving the clarity of the statistical information. The information on overdiagnosis generates confusion among women and controversy among professionals. Faced with the new information presented by the decision aid, the majority of women prefer shared decision-making; however, its feasibility might be limited by a lack of knowledge and attitudes of rejection from healthcare professionals.
这项定性研究评估了一种决策辅助工具,该工具包含乳腺癌筛查的益处和危害,并分析了女性对所获信息的认知以及医疗保健专业人员对提供该信息便利性的认知。在加泰罗尼亚和加那利群岛对7个由40至69岁女性组成的焦点小组(n = 39)以及2个医疗保健专业人员小组(n = 23)进行了研究。焦点小组包括关于乳腺癌筛查决策、决策辅助工具的可接受性和可行性的引导式讨论。进行了内容分析。女性对获得有关乳腺癌筛查益处和危害的信息给予积极评价。一些女性在理解某些概念时存在困难,尤其是那些关于过度诊断的概念。女性更倾向于与医疗保健专业人员共同做出筛查决策。专业人员指出决策辅助工具中未涵盖某些危害和益处,并提议提高统计信息的清晰度。关于过度诊断的信息在女性中造成困惑,在专业人员中引发争议。面对决策辅助工具提供的新信息,大多数女性倾向于共同决策;然而,其可行性可能会受到医疗保健专业人员知识欠缺和抵触态度的限制。