Zwicker C, Langer M, Mäurer J, Hepp W
Rontgenblatter. 1986 Aug;39(8):209-15.
100 intravenous digital subtraction angiograms of bifurcations were compared to one hundred plain film arteriograms. Both types of examinations were of excellent image quality. Arteriosclerotic lesions in the posterior circumference of the internal carotid artery were found in 55% plain film angiograms and in 49% of intravenous DSA examinations. Plain film angiography was significantly more accurate in the evaluation of arteriosclerotic ulcerations than i.v. DSA. The total amounts of arteriosclerotic stenoses with a smooth or rough surface were equal with both methods. The interindividual comparative study demonstrated that in respect of diagnosis of ulcerative lesions, i.v.. DSA is inferior to plain film angiography, even if an excellent image quality for all projections is achieved in i.v. DSA.
将100例分叉处的静脉数字减影血管造影与100例平片动脉造影进行比较。两种检查的图像质量均极佳。在55%的平片血管造影和49%的静脉数字减影血管造影检查中发现颈内动脉后周的动脉硬化病变。在评估动脉硬化性溃疡方面,平片血管造影比静脉数字减影血管造影显著更准确。两种方法检测出的表面光滑或粗糙的动脉硬化狭窄总量相等。个体间比较研究表明,在溃疡性病变的诊断方面,即使静脉数字减影血管造影的所有投照图像质量都很好,静脉数字减影血管造影仍不如平片血管造影。