Manga P, Dhurandhar R W, Stockard B
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1986 Jul;12(7):573-6. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(86)90101-8.
A retrospective analysis compared the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of two methods using noninvasive Doppler ultrasound for detecting the severity of carotid artery disease. Doppler spectral analyses were used in determining the peak systolic frequency (PF) found within the stenosis, as well as the ratio of the peak systolic frequency distal to the stenosis, to the peak systolic frequency within the stenosis (f2/f1). The results of the noninvasive tests were compared with carotid arteriography. The sensitivity of the two methods were similar, but the specificity of f2/f1 was much higher (98%) than PF (88%) with stenosis greater than 50%, and marginally better, 97 and 94%, respectively, with stenosis greater than 75%. The positive predictive value was also better for f2/f1 than PF; 91% and 71% for stenosis greater than 50%, and 77% and 67%, respectively for stenosis greater than 75%. The use of Doppler frequency ratio in conjunction with peak frequency measurements provide a quantitative and fairly accurate evaluation of the severity of carotid artery disease.
一项回顾性分析比较了两种使用无创多普勒超声检测颈动脉疾病严重程度的方法的敏感性、特异性和预测价值。多普勒频谱分析用于确定狭窄部位的收缩期峰值频率(PF),以及狭窄远端的收缩期峰值频率与狭窄部位收缩期峰值频率之比(f2/f1)。将无创检测结果与颈动脉血管造影结果进行比较。两种方法的敏感性相似,但对于大于50%的狭窄,f2/f1的特异性(98%)远高于PF(88%);对于大于75%的狭窄,f2/f1的特异性略好,分别为97%和94%。f2/f1的阳性预测价值也优于PF;对于大于50%的狭窄,分别为91%和71%;对于大于75%的狭窄,分别为77%和67%。结合多普勒频率比和峰值频率测量可对颈动脉疾病的严重程度进行定量且相当准确的评估。