School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Feb;76(2):248-256. doi: 10.1177/17470218221090418. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
Three experiments investigated whether the nature of the temporal referent affects timing behaviour in rats. We used a peak procedure and assessed timing of food well activity as a function of whether the referent was an instrumental response (a lever press that resulted in the withdrawal of the lever) or a conditioned stimulus (CS) that was 2 s in Experiment 1, 500 ms in Experiment 2, and 800 ms in Experiment 3. In all experiments, the interval between the offset of the temporal referent and food was 5 s. The curve fits for each experiment revealed no differences in peak time, but magazine responding immediately following the CS was higher than following a lever press. This pattern of results was interpreted as reflecting a combination of (a) ambiguity in which component of the 500 ms-2-s auditory stimulus was serving as the referent and (b) response competition between lever pressing and magazine activity. Critically, these results suggest that peak timing in rats is unaffected by whether a lever press or CS serves as the referent. This conclusion is consistent with theoretical models of timing behaviour, but not with evidence from humans showing that the subjective perception of time is affected by whether the cause of an outcome was self-generated or not.
三项实验旨在探究时间参照的本质是否会影响大鼠的时间行为。我们使用峰值程序,根据时间参照是工具性反应(导致操纵杆缩回的杠杆按压)还是条件刺激(CS),来评估食物槽活动的时间。在实验 1 中,CS 持续 2 秒;在实验 2 中,CS 持续 500 毫秒;在实验 3 中,CS 持续 800 毫秒。在所有实验中,时间参照的结束与食物之间的间隔为 5 秒。每个实验的曲线拟合结果显示,峰值时间没有差异,但 CS 之后的杂志反应比杠杆按压之后的反应更高。这种结果模式被解释为反映了以下两种情况的组合:(a)听觉刺激的 500 毫秒-2 秒部分作为参照的成分存在模糊性;(b)杠杆按压和杂志活动之间的反应竞争。关键是,这些结果表明,大鼠的峰值时间不受杠杆按压或 CS 作为参照的影响。这一结论与时间行为的理论模型一致,但与人类的证据不一致,人类的证据表明,对结果的主观感知受到结果是自我产生的还是非自我产生的影响。